Re: Different defrag programs
Brian Cryer, ye spur-galled measle, heaven truly knows that thou art as
false as hell, ye agonised:
> <email@example.com> wrote in message
>> Why is it that different programs take different lengths of time? When I
>> used to
>> use the default Windows XP defragger, I'd have to run it overnight it
>> took so
>> long (120Gb drive in 2 partitions). Then I bought Perfect Disk. It still
>> took an
>> hour or two. Now I use a free program called Auslogics Disk Defrag. I
>> actually launch it and sit there and watch it do the job, taking a few
>> on all but my C drive, which maybe takes 7 or 8 minutes. I'm assuming
>> it's doing
>> a good job despite the short length of time it takes. What's up? Thanks.[/color]
> Different defrag programs take different lengths of time because:
> * They do different things - for example, defrag a file or defrag it and
> optimise the positioning of the file.
> * Use different algorithms<BITCHSLAP>[/color]
Doing "different things" is the same as using "different algorithms".
> - controlling both the order in which they do things and the sequencing of
> files (if they shuffle files around).
> * Written by different teams, so some will be better coded than others.[/color]
BWAHAHAHAHA! All Windows defragers use the Windows Defragmentation API. How
many different ways are there to tell the OS the "MOVE THIS FILE TO THAT
> If Auslogics Disk Defrag only takes a few minutes but others take
> significantly longer then its possible that its skipping files.[/color]
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Of course, the fact that the Auslogics's UI uses smoke
and mirrors to entrance the user has nothing to do with perception, right?
> If you do a "defrag -a c:" (to get a rather cruide indication of
> fragmentation) then does this change before and after the defrag?[/color]
What are you going to tell him if he says yes?
> Have you tried jkdefrag?[/color]
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH! A Gawd-awful piece of trash if ever there was one.
> It has the advantage that it can be run as a screen saver, so if you are
> away from your pc for any significant length of time it can kick in. Its
> also free.[/color]
Real meaning: He has absolutely no idea about Auslogics defrag.
> Be aware that if you "sit there and watch it do the job" then you are
> probably wasting more time than you will get back from having defragged
> your disk. YMMV.[/color]
So what? It's his time. What concern is it of yours what he does with his
> Brian Cryer
> The complete and utter techo-moron.[/color]
Edited in the name of TRVTH! on usenet.
"Help keep this site free by making a donation towards its maintenance,
hosted exchange, and hosting costs"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Scumbag cheapskate.
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 
Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List
Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E
Join me for dinner. I'm cooking screwed up coon cat gumboil with corn
vinegar in nearly raw goat bowels and camel blister conserve, arranged
in a splashing bowl with a slew of tiny medley of cherry tomato and
cancerous growth in beet juice, a side of horned toad testicles and a
chalice of limpid eyeball fluid.