Re: Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server share,s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that? - Linux
This is a discussion on Re: Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server share,s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that? - Linux ; On Sep 5, 1:26*pm, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Brock McNuggets) snotted:
>
>
>
> > "Linonut" stated in post
> > cGdwk.24108$vX2.9...@bignews6.bellsouth.net on 9/5/08 10:07 AM:
>
> >> * Snit peremptorily fired off this ...

- Forum
- OS Forums
- Linux
- Re: Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server share,s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that?
-
Re: Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server share,s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that?
On Sep 5, 1:26*pm, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Brock McNuggets) snotted:
>
>
>
> > "Linonut" stated in post
> > cGdwk.24108$vX2.9...@bignews6.bellsouth.net on 9/5/08 10:07 AM:
>
> >> * Snit peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
> >>>> I might as well explain GNU/Linux's place in the IT market to my
> >>>> beagle.
>
> >>> Why do you always blame others for your inability to support your own
> >>> claims? *It is juvenile and shows you do not really think you have
> >>> thought your ideas out.
>
> >> Idiot.
>
> > And that is your best response... you cannot explain why you are so badat
> > supporting your claims.
>
> He simply does not want to explain the obvious to someone with such a bad
> reading comprehension problem like "Raylopez".
> That twit is dumb as a stump (so he is slightly smarter than you are) and
> understands absolutely nothing (so he is slightly ahead of you)
>
> Any explanations on twits like raylopez or you, Snot Glasser, is simply
> wasted time
> --
> I doubt, therefore I might be.
For the mentally retarded Linux idiots, here the OP question once
again... Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server
share, s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that?
-
Re: Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server share, s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that?
On 2008-09-07, shmell_dakaka@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 5, 1:26*pm, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Brock McNuggets) snotted:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Linonut" stated in post
>> > cGdwk.24108$vX2.9...@bignews6.bellsouth.net on 9/5/08 10:07 AM:
>>
>> >> * Snit peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>> >>>> I might as well explain GNU/Linux's place in the IT market to my
>> >>>> beagle.
>>
>> >>> Why do you always blame others for your inability to support your own
>> >>> claims? *It is juvenile and shows you do not really think you have
>> >>> thought your ideas out.
>>
>> >> Idiot.
>>
>> > And that is your best response... you cannot explain why you are so bad at
>> > supporting your claims.
>>
>> He simply does not want to explain the obvious to someone with such a bad
>> reading comprehension problem like "Raylopez".
>> That twit is dumb as a stump (so he is slightly smarter than you are) and
>> understands absolutely nothing (so he is slightly ahead of you)
>>
>> Any explanations on twits like raylopez or you, Snot Glasser, is simply
>> wasted time
>> --
>> I doubt, therefore I might be.
>
> For the mentally retarded Linux idiots, here the OP question once
> again... Microsoft, IBM mentioned as big winners in gaining server
> share, s/w. Gee, no mention of Linux or Apache--why is that?
Already explained. Linux is FREE. Therefore you won't see it listed in
dollar terms.
You need to read the thread better, ****face.
--
Regards,
Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power