"Steve de Mena" stated in post
Cs-dnQgKU5gssCXVnZ2dnUVZ_rfinZ2d@giganews.com on 8/29/08 10:11 AM:

> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.

Nor do I. Peter Köhlmann just keeps harping on a freaking *typo* I made...
a typo I acknowledged I made as soon as it was pointed out. And then he
insists on cross-posting the BS to other groups...

I noted the date listed in the EXIF data of an image - I wrote 28 when I
should have written 26. Peter could not find the EXIF data and then started
lying about multiple images with EXIF data (or no EXIF data - I am not sure
he ever decided what he meant).

Over a *typo* I made and acknowledged Peter Köhlmann has spewed his BS into
CSMA, has belittled my family, lied about my personal life (well,

So Peter, take your garbage to your *own* email... leave it out of CSMA, out
of COLA, and if you clutter my email I will simply create a rule to have
your BS deleted.

This debate is over.



--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.

* Tattoo Vampire peremptorily fired off this memo:

> Steve de Mena wrote:
>
>> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.
>
> Killfiles can set you free, champ.

Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief.

If I hear about his breakfast choices again, I'm going to lose my lunch.

--
What they say: What they mean:
A major technological breakthrough... Back to the drawing board.
Developed after years of research Discovered by pure accident.
Designs are within allowable limits We made it, stretching a point or two.
We are looking forward to Windows 7 Vista sucks rat bags

* Snit peremptorily fired off this memo:

> This debate is over.

Make it so.

--
"Verily and forsooth," replied Goodgulf darkly. "In the past year
strange and fearful wonders I have seen. Fields sown with barley reap
crabgrass and fungus, and even small gardens reject their artichoke hearts.
There has been a hot day in December and a blue moon. Calendars are made with
a month of Sundays and a blue-ribbon Holstein bore alive two insurance
salesmen. The earth splits and the entrails of a goat were found tied in
square knots. The face of the sun blackens and the skies have rained down
soggy potato chips."
"But what do all these things mean?" gasped Frito.
"Beats me," said Goodgulf with a shrug, "but I thought it made good
copy."
-- Harvard Lampoon, "Bored of the Rings"

Linonut wrote:

> effete candy-ass

Which is exactly what he sounds like on the phone.
--
Regards,
[tv]

....Adolescence - the time between puberty and adultery.

Owner/Proprietor, Cheesus Crust Pizza Company
Good to the last supper

"Linonut" stated in post
C%buk.18872$XB4.12679@bignews9.bellsouth.net on 8/30/08 6:39 AM:

> * Snit peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> This debate is over.
>
> Make it so.

Well, I have reconsidered. I did not understand the depth and the
importance of this debate. Do you not understand, *NOT ONLY* do Tattoo
Vampire and I disagree if a calendar in a photo was outdated, *NOT ONLY* do
we disagree about EXIF data, but - AND THIS IS IMPORTANT - I made a typo.
That is right... I typed 28 when I should have typed 26.

This, Linonut, as you can see, just may be one of the biggest issues to over
rock humanity, not to mention COLA, and with Peter Köhlmann's cross posting,
CSMA as well!

The balance of all humanity and not a few penguins just might ride on which
side of this debate you align yourself with. I beg of you to choose wisely
- your immortal soul's fate shall depend on your decisions now!


--
Teachers open the door but you must walk through it yourself.

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:41:32 -0700, Snit wrote:

> I, on the
> other hand, *proved* he was ignorant about what a person's IP address is
> (as opposed to a web address or the address of a mail server),

What you "proved" and what you think you proved are generally different,
Snit.

-Thufir

"thufir" stated in post
YZ1vk.62376$hx.22679@pd7urf3no on 9/1/08 7:59 PM:

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:41:32 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> I, on the
>> other hand, *proved* he was ignorant about what a person's IP address is
>> (as opposed to a web address or the address of a mail server),
>
> What you "proved" and what you think you proved are generally different,
> Snit.

But, of course, you are simply too incompetent to find any flaw in my
proof... even though you deny it. Frankly you are a boring troll who just
whines a lot and never even tries to support your BS.

Then again, you are the moron who claimed that Santa Clause was the number
one key programmer of Linux... just as much as I said the garbage you
attributed to me... right?

LOL!




--
"Innovation is not about saying yes to everything. It's about saying NO to
all but the most crucial features." -- Steve Jobs

Snit wrote:

> Yup... and then you caught me making a typo... I said the data in the file
> indicated "28" and you corrected me and stated it was "26". I made a
> goof.
> Yup. You caught me red handed making a typo.

No, I reminded you of what day it was - nothing about nonexistent EXIF tags.

It's amusing to watch the Prescott Computer Guy (which is very similar to
Prescott Computer, another business in your burg) cook up a tall tale, get
caught red-handed lying his ass off, then furiously wiggle and dance as he
tries to extricate himself from his own big mouth.
--
Regards,
[tv]

....Why is the word abbreviation so long?

Owner/Proprietor, Cheesus Crust Pizza Company
Good to the last supper

Snit wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire freaks out over my having made a type (I typed 28 when I
> meant 26), while openly lying about me having called him and spewing BS
> about my personal and business life. He also repeatedly snips context and
> changes the topic to avoid talking about his proved lies.

OK, Michael. Here's your chance to show yourself to be an honest member of
COLA. You laughed about my pic showing an "old" calendar on the wall. I told
you it was an old photo. You said I was a liar and that the EXIF tags proved
it was a recent one.

NOW - lets' see your proof. Post a screenshot showing said data, or admit
you were just trying to troll me.

I *know* that you can't, because that image has no EXIF tags embedded.