Re: [News] Many More Microsoft Shills Exposed and Listed

In article <3708098.qVK2ccYF3k@schestowitz.com>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | This is going to be a list of big publisher shills. Those are
> | people who take their marching orders from big companies but
> | pretend to be independent experts.
> `----
>
> [url]http://slashdot.org/~twitter/journal/206959[/url][/color]

Great source. Here's how his recent comments on slashdot have been
moderated:

0, Insightful
-1
-1
-1, Flamebait
-1
3, Interesting
-1, Troll
-1, Troll
3, Insightful
-1, Troll
-1, Offtopic
-1, Troll
-1, Troll
3, Insightful
-1, Troll
-1
-1, Troll
-1
-1, Offtopic
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1

....[color=blue]
>
> [url]http://www.microturfs.org/[/url]
>[/color]

Another great source...their main criteria for listing seems to be
having publicly supported OOXML. Is you contention now that *everyone*
who has ever supported OOXML is on Microsoft's payroll?

--
--Tim Smith