suse and fedora - Linux

This is a discussion on suse and fedora - Linux ; This review does not look pretty. But then again, neither does Fedora. Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking thing. They just all fix ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: suse and fedora

  1. suse and fedora

    This review does not look pretty. But then again,
    neither does Fedora.

    Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint.
    Choice is limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same
    freaking thing. They just all fix bugs.

    Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good
    release out? NAAAA I think they want to be the next microsoft.

    I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
    installer,
    instead of everybody rolling their own? I can hope.

    http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review

    Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.

  2. Re: suse and fedora

    On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:42:04 -0700, Psyc Geek (TAB) wrote:

    > This review does not look pretty. But then again, neither does Fedora.


    Then why don't you just go back to Windows?

    >
    > Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is
    > limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking
    > thing. They just all fix bugs.


    So you are saying bug fixes are bad?

    >
    > Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good release out?


    And why are the current releases of PCLinuxOS, Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva,
    etc not "good releases?

    NAAAA
    > I think they want to be the next microsoft.
    >
    > I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
    > installer, instead of everybody rolling their own?
    > I can hope.
    >
    > http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review
    >
    > Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.


    Is is called distro differentiation.




    --
    Rick

  3. Re: suse and fedora

    On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:05 -0500, Rick wrote:

    > On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:42:04 -0700, Psyc Geek (TAB) wrote:
    >
    >> This review does not look pretty. But then again, neither does Fedora.

    >
    > Then why don't you just go back to Windows?
    >
    >>
    >> Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is
    >> limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking
    >> thing. They just all fix bugs.

    >
    > So you are saying bug fixes are bad?
    >
    >>
    >> Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good release out?

    >
    > And why are the current releases of PCLinuxOS, Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva,
    > etc not "good releases?
    >
    > NAAAA
    >> I think they want to be the next microsoft.
    >>
    >> I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
    >> installer, instead of everybody rolling their own?
    >> I can hope.
    >>
    >> http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review
    >>
    >> Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.

    >
    > Is is called distro differentiation.


    It's called fragmentation and mass confusion.

    --
    Moshe Goldfarb
    Collector of soaps from around the globe.
    Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
    http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

  4. Re: suse and fedora

    On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:42:18 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

    > On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:05 -0500, Rick wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:42:04 -0700, Psyc Geek (TAB) wrote:
    >>
    >>> This review does not look pretty. But then again, neither does
    >>> Fedora.

    >>
    >> Then why don't you just go back to Windows?
    >>
    >>
    >>> Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is
    >>> limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking
    >>> thing. They just all fix bugs.

    >>
    >> So you are saying bug fixes are bad?
    >>
    >>
    >>> Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good release out?

    >>
    >> And why are the current releases of PCLinuxOS, Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva,
    >> etc not "good releases?
    >>
    >> NAAAA
    >>> I think they want to be the next microsoft.
    >>>
    >>> I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
    >>> installer, instead of everybody rolling their own? I can hope.
    >>>
    >>> http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review
    >>>
    >>> Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.

    >>
    >> Is is called distro differentiation.

    >
    > It's called fragmentation and mass confusion.


    I am not confused. Red Hat customers are not confused. Suse customers are
    not confused.

    .... so you're confused. So what?


    --
    Rick

+ Reply to Thread