-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mozilla Foundation developing a model for a security metric

,----[ Quote ]
| The Mozilla Foundation plans to develop a better model for gauging the
| security of its Firefox web browser. In contrast to Microsoft, the number of
| officially provided security updates is not to be the sole parameter used.
`----

http://www.heise.de/english/newstick...571/from/rss09

Microsoft is regularly being caught patching things secretly and/or combining
things to reduce numbers. Microsoft is a marketing company. It lies.


Recent:

Web security report says known vulnerabilities fall because criminals pay to
hide them

,----[ Quote ]
| Some researchers fear software vendors are now buying information on the
| vulnerabilities so they can fix them without anyone noticing.
|
| In other words, Rouland fears, "it is profitable not to (publicly) report a
| vulnerability."
`----

http://news.smh.com.au/web-security-...0212-1rrs.html


Microsoft examples:

Vista SP1 will contain undocumented fixes

,----[ Quote ]
| Interesting email in today mailbag: *“Will SP1 contain undisclosed or
| undocumented security fixes?”
|
| For some people, counting the number of security flaws that one OS has
| compared to another is important because it offers a metric upon which to *
| determine which OS is the most secure (personally, I feel that it’s a bogus
| metric, but I’ll let it slide for now). *However, many claim that Microsoft
| stacks the deck in its favor by not disclosing a full list of vulnerabilities
| that have been patched by omitting to include those discovered and patched
| in-house. * * *
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1225


Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft Metrics

,----[ Quote ]
| This is a small subset of all the vulnerabilities, because the
| vulnerabilities that are found through the QA process and the vulnerabilities
| that are found by the security folks they engage as contractors to perform
| penetration testing are fixed in service packs and major updates. For
| Microsoft this makes sense because these fixes get the benefit of a full test
| pass which is much more robust for a service pack or major release than it is
| for a security update. * * *
`----

http://blog.mozilla.com/security/200...osoft-metrics/


http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowa...00/PX03096.pdf


Skeletons in Microsoft’s Patch Day closet

,----[ Quote ]
| This is the first time I’ve seen Microsoft prominently admit to silently
| fixing vulnerabilities in its bulletins — a controversial practice that
| effectively reduces the number of publicly documented bug fixes (for those
| keeping count) and affects patch management/deployment decisions. *
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=316


Beware of undisclosed Microsoft patches

,----[ Quote ]
| Forget for a moment whether Microsoft is throwing off patch counts
| that Microsoft brass use to compare its security record with those
| of its competitors. What do you think of Redmond’s silent patching
| practice?
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=527


Microsoft is Counting Bugs Again

,----[ Quote ]
| Sorry, but Microsoft's self-evaluating security counting isn't really a
| good accounting.
|
| [...]
|
| The point: Don't count on security flaw counting. The real flaw is
| the counting.
`----

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/conte...129TX1K0000535
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhz2AAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7dAgCeM2AeIMLbhs N9Tm2ur9GjFysV
uxUAnjdPkn4kpmQWgu+vWKi8XmHc0mhk
=+J1L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----