Richard Rasker writes:

> Homer wrote:
>
>> Verily I say unto thee, that Richard Rasker spake thusly:
>>
>>> http://w3.bsa.org/netherlands/ - Result: Failed validation, 459
>>> Errors
>>>
>>> THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!
>>
>> Here's another, not quite so shocking, but perhaps even more ironic:
>>
>> http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development.htm
>> Result: Failed validation, 13 Errors
>
> Hehe, quite funny indeed. And while we're at it, how does the W3C site
> itself validate?
>
> "Sorry, the IP address of validator.w3.org is not public. For security
> reasons, validating resources located at non-public IP addresses has been
> disabled in this service."
>
> Hmm, a bit disappointing, although their main site (www.w3.org) passes --
> then again, any other result would have been surprising indeed.
>
> Richard Rasker

LOL. Just listen to you all preaching from the pulpit! They disabled it
probably to stop starch collared phoneys like you constantly loading
their server with W3C validation checks!

Homer writes:

> Verily I say unto thee, that Richard Rasker spake thusly:
>> Homer wrote:
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Richard Rasker spake thusly:
>
>>>> http://w3.bsa.org/netherlands/ - Result: Failed validation, 459
>>>> Errors
>>>>
>>>> THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!
>>>
>>> Here's another, not quite so shocking, but perhaps even more
>>> ironic:
>>>
>>> http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development.htm
>>> Result: Failed validation, 13 Errors
>>
>> Hehe, quite funny indeed.
>
> I also just noticed ... what's an "htm" file, since AFAICT such a thing
> does not exist? Is that the DOS equivalent of HTML, by any chance?

No. Its one other standard extension for html files and is used
all over the place.

--
"I am not worthy to wipe your pee-pee "
-- Liarnut in comp.os.linux.advocacy

In article , Homer
wrote:
> >> http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development.htm
> >> Result: Failed validation, 13 Errors
> >
> > Hehe, quite funny indeed.
>
> I also just noticed ... what's an "htm" file, since AFAICT such a thing
> does not exist? Is that the DOS equivalent of HTML, by any chance?

".htm" is exactly as standard as ".html". Also exactly as standard
would be ".my_web_page_stuff", ".vocational_guidance_counsellor", or
even nothing at all.

--
--Tim Smith

On 2008-07-05, Tim Smith wrote:
> In article , Homer
> wrote:
>> >> http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development.htm
>> >> Result: Failed validation, 13 Errors
>> >
>> > Hehe, quite funny indeed.
>>
>> I also just noticed ... what's an "htm" file, since AFAICT such a thing
>> does not exist? Is that the DOS equivalent of HTML, by any chance?
>
> ".htm" is exactly as standard as ".html". Also exactly as standard
> would be ".my_web_page_stuff", ".vocational_guidance_counsellor", or
> even nothing at all.

Yeah, a hangover from the old 8.3 filenaming system.

--
Regards,

Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power