.xsessions-error file - Linux
This is a discussion on .xsessions-error file - Linux ; I just discovered that my file system was filling up for no reason,
and discovered a hidden file called .xsession-errors located in my
home directory. the file size was a massive *685* MB.
Obviously my "just works" system is not ...
-
.xsessions-error file
I just discovered that my file system was filling up for no reason,
and discovered a hidden file called .xsession-errors located in my
home directory. the file size was a massive *685* MB.
Obviously my "just works" system is not working, otherwise
why would x be generating such a large error file.
Is there anyway to switch off the service that generates
this file?
-
Re: .xsessions-error file
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:37:20 -0500, Rubee Murree wrote:
> I just discovered that my file system was filling up for no reason,
> and discovered a hidden file called .xsession-errors located in my
> home directory. the file size was a massive *685* MB.
> Obviously my "just works" system is not working, otherwise
> why would x be generating such a large error file.
> Is there anyway to switch off the service that generates
> this file?
It's another example of Linux Slopware...
Google it.
You are far from being alone with this bug.
Of course, Linux just *works* for the Linux LIARS in COLA.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
-
Re: .xsessions-error file
On 2008-06-28, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:37:20 -0500, Rubee Murree wrote:
>
>> I just discovered that my file system was filling up for no reason,
>> and discovered a hidden file called .xsession-errors located in my
>> home directory. the file size was a massive *685* MB.
>> Obviously my "just works" system is not working, otherwise
>> why would x be generating such a large error file.
>> Is there anyway to switch off the service that generates
>> this file?
>
> It's another example of Linux Slopware...
> Google it.
>
> You are far from being alone with this bug.
>
> Of course, Linux just *works* for the Linux LIARS in COLA.
>
Just have. Here is one interesting article.
http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/lin...on-errors.html
poor guy had an incredible 42GB file. That was in 2006, so I'm wondering
why this is still an issue when the "Linux freedom community" boast so
much about being able to find and fix problems more quickly than
Microsoft. Microsoft may be slow off the block, but a patch
would eventually be made available. OSS developers don't get paid
a bean, so why would they care less.
-
Re: .xsessions-error file
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:12:12 -0500, Rubee Murree wrote:
> On 2008-06-28, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:37:20 -0500, Rubee Murree wrote:
>>
>>> I just discovered that my file system was filling up for no reason,
>>> and discovered a hidden file called .xsession-errors located in my
>>> home directory. the file size was a massive *685* MB.
>>> Obviously my "just works" system is not working, otherwise
>>> why would x be generating such a large error file.
>>> Is there anyway to switch off the service that generates
>>> this file?
>>
>> It's another example of Linux Slopware...
>> Google it.
>>
>> You are far from being alone with this bug.
>>
>> Of course, Linux just *works* for the Linux LIARS in COLA.
>>
>
> Just have. Here is one interesting article.
>
> http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/lin...on-errors.html
>
> poor guy had an incredible 42GB file. That was in 2006, so I'm wondering
> why this is still an issue when the "Linux freedom community" boast so
> much about being able to find and fix problems more quickly than
> Microsoft. Microsoft may be slow off the block, but a patch
> would eventually be made available. OSS developers don't get paid
> a bean, so why would they care less.
That's because the Linux loons are too busy trying add features and eye
candy rather than fixing the huge number of bugs that exist.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
-
Re: .xsessions-error file
"Rubee Murree" schreef in bericht
news:slrng6cvnt.2bt.Madras@localhost.localdomain.. .
> On 2008-06-28, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:37:20 -0500, Rubee Murree wrote:
>>
>>> I just discovered that my file system was filling up for no reason,
>>> and discovered a hidden file called .xsession-errors located in my
>>> home directory. the file size was a massive *685* MB.
>>> Obviously my "just works" system is not working, otherwise
>>> why would x be generating such a large error file.
>>> Is there anyway to switch off the service that generates
>>> this file?
>>
>> It's another example of Linux Slopware...
>> Google it.
>>
>> You are far from being alone with this bug.
>>
>> Of course, Linux just *works* for the Linux LIARS in COLA.
>>
>
> Just have. Here is one interesting article.
>
> http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/lin...on-errors.html
>
> poor guy had an incredible 42GB file. That was in 2006, so I'm wondering
> why this is still an issue when the "Linux freedom community" boast so
> much about being able to find and fix problems more quickly than
> Microsoft.
Cola hypocrites run windows all the time:
* Marti van Lin (ML2MST) runs XP with Vista look right now!
http://osgeex.blogspot.com/2007/11/f...indows-xp.html
http://bp0.blogger.com/_dQCKkApAq-Q/...vista_file.png
http://bp3.blogger.com/_dQCKkApAq-Q/...ista_media.png
* "7", AKA Joseph MICHAEL, MANAGING DIRECTOR - ROBODYNE CYBERNETICS LTDA,
Lifelong Windows Developer, Pretend Linux "Advocate"
* Mark Kent, Linux advocate by night and Microsoft partner by day.
http://www.jnetx.com/index.php?id=products
Mark Kent's partner Microsoft:
http://www.jnetx.com/index.php?id=ourpartners
* Liarnut, runs windows on PC's of his wife and daughter.
* Peter (PIK) Idiot Kohlman, a Windows developer and programmer.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp....a?dmode=source
The list is endless!
Meet the morons: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
> Microsoft may be slow off the block, but a patch
> would eventually be made available. OSS developers don't get paid
> a bean, so why would they care less.
>