[News] Linux Has Fork() Advantage Over Windows - Linux
This is a discussion on [News] Linux Has Fork() Advantage Over Windows - Linux ; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Running With Forks
,----[ Quote ]
| On a Windows computer, there is no configurable limit to the number of
| processes you can run. So it is relatively trivial to create a batch ...
-
[News] Linux Has Fork() Advantage Over Windows
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Running With Forks
,----[ Quote ]
| On a Windows computer, there is no configurable limit to the number of
| processes you can run. So it is relatively trivial to create a batch file to
| launch the same application in an infinite loop until the system is unusable.
| Some Windows services provide protection, in particular IIS can be configured
| to restrict total number of threads and CPU being consumed. However, this is
| not system-wide and certainly leaves the door open for trojan applications
| that may want to take your computer away from you.
|
| UNIX operating systems, however, have the concept of ULIMIT. This facility
| has evolved, and while most distributions don’t bother to configure any
| limits they are easily setup and can serve as a protective barrier between
| you and a poorly written application.
`----
http://www.micromux.com/2008/04/15/r...imultaneously/
Related:
Oracle claims no Linux ulterior motive
,----[ Quote ]
| Oracle is using LinuxWorld to try and calm concerns its Enterprise Linux and
| Unbreakable Linux Network (ULN) will fork Red Hat and fragment the Linux
| market. Â*
`----
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/200...e_uln_red_hat/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIV+gxU4xAY3RXLo4RAguSAKCB0cjU8c/sbeUEkUYfl2p04S0frACgm1CC
fZ+9inY89wEynXF1NGADArs=
=lqAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [News] Linux Has Fork() Advantage Over Windows
"Roy Schestowitz" wrote in message
news:1474525.3iZPU1tJt9@schestowitz.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Running With Forks
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | On a Windows computer, there is no configurable limit to the number of
> | processes you can run. So it is relatively trivial to create a batch
> file to
> | launch the same application in an infinite loop until the system is
> unusable.
> | Some Windows services provide protection, in particular IIS can be
> configured
> | to restrict total number of threads and CPU being consumed. However,
> this is
> | not system-wide and certainly leaves the door open for trojan
> applications
> | that may want to take your computer away from you.
> |
> | UNIX operating systems, however, have the concept of ULIMIT. This
> facility
> | has evolved, and while most distributions don't bother to configure any
> | limits they are easily setup and can serve as a protective barrier
> between
> | you and a poorly written application.
> `----
>
> http://www.micromux.com/2008/04/15/r...imultaneously/
>
What an absolutely pathetic troll attempt. Even for a scumbag like you Roy
Schestowitz. What's next... Linux is better because the background color on
the installer is red instead of the blue that Windows has?
Windows doesn't have a ULIMIT. But it's trivial to limit the number of
"handles" for a user. By limiting the number of handles you've limited the
total number of processes, threads, open-files and other resources for the
user.
But otherwise yeah... I'm sure lots of "normal people" are going to start
using linux now because of the ULIMIT that can be set (although I don't know
of a single distro that has ULIMIT set at anything other than "unlimited" by
default.)
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
-
Re: [News] Linux Has Fork() Advantage Over Windows
"Roy Schestowitz" schreef in bericht
news:1474525.3iZPU1tJt9@schestowitz.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
Your post is off-topic in this COLA, your violating [comp.os.linux.advocacy]
FAQ and Primer for COLA, Edition III
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
* The trespasser has come to COLA in order to vent his dislike of
Microsoft and/or Windows. For that purpose several newsgroups have
been created.
* alt.crimehip.microsoft.sucks
* alt.emircpih.microsoft.sucks
* alt.flame.ms-windows
* alt.h.i.p.c.r.i.m.e.microsoft.sucks
* alt.h0pcr0me.microsoft.sucks
* alt.h1pcr1me.microsoft.sucks
* alt.h2pcr2me.microsoft.sucks
* alt.hh.ii.pp.cc.rr.ii.mm.ee.microsoft.sucks
* alt.hipclone.microsoft.sucks
* alt.hipcrime.microsoft.sucks
* alt.microsoft.crash.crash.crash
* alt.microsoft.sucks
* alt.os.windows95.crash.crash.crash
* comp.misc.microsoft.sucks
* microsoft.sucks.
* sk.sux.microsoft
Fsck you arsehole troll
*PLONK*