Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer) - Linux

This is a discussion on Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer) - Linux ; "chrisv" wrote in message news:90lt44p32k0mp3mnie3rf666tm1t8cesam@4ax.com... > Lurky/Edwin wrote: > >>"Mayor of R'lyeh" wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:50:04 -0500, chrisv >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>Here's my point "Mayor". >>>> >>>>*plonk* >>> >>> Run away, coward, run away! > ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)

  1. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)


    "chrisv" wrote in message
    news:90lt44p32k0mp3mnie3rf666tm1t8cesam@4ax.com...
    > Lurky/Edwin wrote:
    >
    >>"Mayor of R'lyeh" wrote:
    >>>
    >>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:50:04 -0500, chrisv
    >>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>Here's my point "Mayor".
    >>>>
    >>>>*plonk*
    >>>
    >>> Run away, coward, run away!

    >
    > How does not caring to see your fsckwittery make me a "coward",
    > "Mayor"?
    >
    > It's not like you and I were arguing about something...
    >
    >>I thought that "plonk" was a one time thing.

    >
    > Usually is. Sometimes I put a time-limit on them. On rare occasions,
    > I will change machines or otherwise clean-out the filters.
    >
    >>I could swear chrisv has
    >>"plonked" every poster here ten times over, at least!

    >
    > To so swear would be a lie. Certainly, your "Edwin" nym has been
    > plonked for some time...
    >
    > *plonk* "Lurky"


    How ever will I go on?


    ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

  2. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)

    On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:08:16 -0400, Lurky wrote:
    > How ever will I go on?


    On what? An interview? A date?


  3. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)


    "Tim Murray" wrote in message
    news:7UB3k.2609$Xe.1941@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
    > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:08:16 -0400, Lurky wrote:
    >> How ever will I go on?

    >
    > On what? An interview? A date?


    You're joking, right?


    ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

  4. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)

    On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:25:04 -0500, chrisv
    wrote:

    >Lurky/Edwin wrote:
    >
    >>"Mayor of R'lyeh" wrote:
    >>>
    >>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:50:04 -0500, chrisv
    >>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>Here's my point "Mayor".
    >>>>
    >>>>*plonk*
    >>>
    >>> Run away, coward, run away!

    >
    >How does not caring to see your fsckwittery make me a "coward",
    >"Mayor"?


    Why are you hiding behind a killfile like a scared little girl hides
    behind her mama's skirt and still talking to me?
    My '****wittery' consisted entirely of pointing out that one of your
    fellow travellers was making a nonsensical argument. Apparently that's
    more than you tender little feelings can handle.

    >
    >It's not like you and I were arguing about something...
    >
    >>I thought that "plonk" was a one time thing.

    >
    >Usually is. Sometimes I put a time-limit on them. On rare occasions,
    >I will change machines or otherwise clean-out the filters.


    We call that 'backpedalling' around here.

    >>I could swear chrisv has
    >>"plonked" every poster here ten times over, at least!

    >
    >To so swear would be a lie. Certainly, your "Edwin" nym has been
    >plonked for some time...
    >
    >*plonk* "Lurky"


    What a wuss. If you don't 100% agree with him in every way he runs
    away crying.



  5. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)

    On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Tim Murray
    wrote:

    >On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:08:16 -0400, Lurky wrote:
    >> How ever will I go on?

    >
    >On what? An interview? A date?


    Getting lonely and desparate, are you? 8)



  6. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)

    On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:22:23 -0400, Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
    > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Tim Murray
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:08:16 -0400, Lurky wrote:
    >>> How ever will I go on?

    >>
    >> On what? An interview? A date?

    >
    > Getting lonely and desparate, are you? 8)
    >


    My one-liners are a lot better.


  7. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)


    "Tim Murray" wrote in message
    news:1oH3k.2826$rW2.2025@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
    > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:22:23 -0400, Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
    >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Tim Murray
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:08:16 -0400, Lurky wrote:
    >>>> How ever will I go on?
    >>>
    >>> On what? An interview? A date?

    >>
    >> Getting lonely and desparate, are you? 8)
    >>

    >
    > My one-liners are a lot better.


    You must be keeping the good ones to yourself.



    ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

  8. Re: Windows need no apply (world' fastest supercomputer)


    "Ramon F Herrera" wrote in message
    news:923a48ea-cb30-4ed6-871a-d21a5b7fa68c@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
    >
    > http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/09/f....ap/index.html
    >




    The interconnecting system occupies 6,000 square feet with 57 miles of fiber
    optics and weighs 500,000 pounds. Although made from commercial parts, the
    computer consists of 6,948 dual-core computer chips and 12,960 cell engines,
    and it has 80 terabytes of memory.



    And they're going to need all of that computing power just to get Open
    Office to launch in a respectable amount of time.



    ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2