-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Freedom and privacy in the cloud: a call for action

,----[ Quote ]
| The freedom to keep your data for yourself and the freedom to run free
| software. You should be able to reclaim and enjoy these freedoms also when
| using web applications.
`----

http://www.clipperz.com/users/marco/...ud_call_action

Performance booster for Web-based devs:

Ruby on Rails Performance Options Grow

,----[ Quote ]
| Ruby on Rails (RoR) is a popular open source development framework because it
| enables rapid application development.
|
| The new performance management and profiling tools are important additions to
| the RoR development community as RoR moves from being a hobbyist development
| language to a bona fide enterprise development framework.
`----

http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news...le.php/3750221

Microsoft is trying to infect Ruby with .NET and XAML at the moment. Web-based
software hurts it badly.


Recent:

Down To Business: As IBM Reaches For Cloud, Where Next Microsoft?

,----[ Quote ]
| IBM's alignment with Google around Linux and Internet standards should have
| its longtime rival sweating sans Yahoo.
`----

http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=207601200


SaaS, Open Source and the Migration of Burden

,----[ Quote ]
| Just the week before I had a reporter ask me how Linux is going to deal with
| the threat of cloud computing. The threat? I told her that virtually all of
| the major cloud computing initiatives (except Microsoft’s) are built on
| Linux. (There is a potential displacement there for Linux distribution
| vendors but that’s another topic.) Linux as a platform is the enabling
| backbone of software as a service and cloud computing.
`----

http://www.linux-foundation.org/webl...ion-of-burden/


Lost in the Clouds

,----[ Quote ]
| Just as the open source LAMP stack created the current wave of Web 2.0
| companies, so free software will run the magic machinery keeping clouds
| aloft. *
`----

http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/20...in-clouds.html


Can Microsoft be beaten in the cloud?

,----[ Quote ]
| The spat seems to be over for now, but the fight with Phoenix is instructive.
| Microsoft is far smarter than we generally give it credit. The company keeps
| an eagle eye on its desktop prize, and is unlikely to allow anyone to build
| rival technology there. The only way to compete with Microsoft on the desktop
| is not on the desktop - it's in the cloud.
`----

http://www.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-994...bj=TheOpenRoad


Microsoft’s Hailstorm reappearing in the cloud?

,----[ Quote ]
| Joel calls the creators of these efforts “architecture astronauts.” They
| generate plenty of hype, not only on Microsoft’s part, but across the
| industry in general around this next permutation of Cloud Computing.
|
| But it’s not the hype that has Joel really ticked off — it’s the fact that a
| whole generation of valuable and highly paid software architects and
| programmers are being sucked up into this vortex, “working on hopeless and
| useless architecture astronomy.”
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=1103


Why Microsoft's approach to data centers won't work

,----[ Quote ]
| The problem is that each UPS, in the process of "conditioning" the power,
| also creates "harmonics" that bounce back up the supply line and can "crap up
| power for everyone else," Baker said.
|
| Harmonics is a well-known issue that's been managed in other contexts, so
| Baker isn't saying the problem is unsolvable. But, he argues, the extra
| infrastructure needed to alleviate the harmonics generated by 220 UPSs -- the
| number of containers Microsoft thinks it can fit inside the Chicago data
| center -- could easily negate the potential ROI from using containers.
`----

http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php/i...fpid;337468494


Related:

Thoughts on JavaOne 2008 (mostly good, but lots of confusing messages from Sun)

,----[ Quote ]
| Java is still the language of choice in the enterprise. Even with the rise of
| LAMP Java remains important and makes up huge swaths of the IT landscape in
| major enterprises--at least those who are not .NET. Even open source Java
| applications on Windows are popular.
|
| [...]
|
| There are also a number of Sun software products that ARE BUILT ON OPEN
| SOURCE, but NOT OPEN SOURCE. One example of this is JCAPs, which is the sad
| remnant of the $387m SeeBeyond acquisition. Sun ported the JCAPs connectors
| to Open ESB, built the whole thing into NetBeans and closed sourced the
| product. This is not just weird, its also stupid and disingenuous.
`----

http://www.cnet.com/8301-13846_1-993...gativeApproach


Do we need to protect open source from the cloud?

,----[ Quote ]
| Some view this as a simple loophole to be plugged. The GPL was originally
| written very much within the context of Unix programmatic and operating
| system interfaces. Therefore, the reasoning goes, the only reason the GPL
| didn't encompass access via Web services is that there were no Web
| services--at least in anything like their current form--when the GPL was
| created. That the new GPLv3 specifically doesn't address this "loophole"
| either was more a matter of practicality than principle by this view.
|
| And, in fact, one approach to eliminating this loophole is a straightforward
| enough approach. The Affero GPL is a straightforward extension to the GPLv3
| license that essentially expands the definition of distribution to encompass
| the delivery of services over the network.
`----

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-993...&subj=NewsBlog


Feeling the heat at Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| If I ask you who is Microsoft's biggest competitor now, who would it be?
|
| Ballmer: Open...Linux. I don't want to say open source. Linux, certainly have
| to go with that.
`----

http://www.news.com/Feeling-the-heat...tag=ne.fd.mnbc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIQj6GU4xAY3RXLo4RAvMRAJwKlWM7yPGzTQet7Qnotb SGKr0I6ACdHSUP
i9vLnvLGn7/eGl5LhZWas0g=
=dt3r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----