White House 'loses' five million emails

Learning the lessons of Watergate

Written by Iain Thomson


It is worrying that the very body supposed to be upholding the law is
clearly in violation of it

Juergen Obermann GFT Solutions

The White House has stated that it is unable to provide investigators with
over five million emails relating to the run-up to the Iraq war because it
has accidentally deleted them.

Campaign groups Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and
the National Security Archive filed requests in May for copies of emails
from the White House relating to a number of issues, including the
planning for the war in Iraq.

The White House has been fighting the case ever since and has now claimed
that it cannot comply as the emails have been lost.

A court has now given the Executive Office of the President until 5 May to
come up with a full account of its data backup strategy, and to clarify
the status of backup tapes covering March 2003 to October 2005.

White House staff have offered contradictory claims that backup tapes have
been overwritten.

"The court is reacting to the inconsistencies in the White House
statements, " said Meredith Fuchs, general counsel at the National
Security Archive.

"Emails are lost one day, the next they are not. Emails are recoverable,
then they are not. Backup media is saved, then it is not.

"What worries us is that time is passing. There are only eight and a half
months until this administration leaves office.

"If nothing is done soon not only could the emails disappear for good, but
the federal records that are commingled with the presidential records
could get swept away and become inaccessible for the next 12 years."

Some have questioned how it is possible that so many emails have gone
missing from a government department.

The Executive Office of the President has previously said that the losses
occurred while switching from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange when
staffers were left to decide what to archive and what to delete.

"Given the technological advances of today's society, it seems a little
archaic to leave the archiving of potentially sensitive and highly
classified information in the hands of the end user, particularly for an
organisation so firmly in the public spotlight," said Juergen Obermann,
chief executive at archiving specialist GFT Solutions.

"While this throws up some serious concerns over internal policy it is
more worrying that, by failing to archive all correspondence, the very
body supposed to be upholding the law is clearly in violation of it."

--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software

So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998

http://fairuse.nylxs.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002

"Yeah - I write Free Software...so SUE ME"

"The tremendous problem we face is that we are becoming sharecroppers to our own cultural heritage -- we need the ability to participate in our own society."

"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.<
You must be a stupid engineer then, because politcs and technology have been attached at the hip since the 1st dynasty in Ancient Egypt. I guess you missed that one."

© Copyright for the Digital Millennium