mike-yue writes:

> It has following features:
> 1. no client side plug-in, only browsers on client side
> 2. simple, don't need so many functionalities
> 3. low resource consumption
> 4. stable
> 5. no need for high volume
>
> Any recommendations? Many thanks

What's wrong with IRC?

--
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr.com

On 4月21日, 下�4时12分, MånsRullgård wrote:
> mike-yue writes:
> > It has following features:
> > 1. no client side plug-in, only browsers on client side
> > 2. simple, don't need so many functionalities
> > 3. low resource consumption
> > 4. stable
> > 5. no need for high volume
>
> > Any recommendations? Many thanks
>
> What's wrong with IRC?
>
> --
> Måns Rullgård
> m...@mansr.com

In my mind IRC is for professionals, especially with Linux.
IRC needs a client module
IRC is not friendly with IE.

On Apr 22, 11:39 pm, mike-yue wrote:

> In my mind IRC is for professionals, especially with Linux.

It's definitely suitable for professional use, but why is that bad?

> IRC needs a client module

Every protocol needs a client.

> IRC is not friendly with IE.

Nonsense. There are many Java and Flash IRC clients which work
perfectly in popular browsers.

DS