Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed" - Linux

This is a discussion on Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed" - Linux ; "If stability is your main concern (because, for example, your box controls cardiac pacemakers), you can't do without Debian Stable -cleanly installed and set up it will run 100% stable- guaranteeed. That's why it is used in mission critical surroundings." ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

  1. Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

    "If stability is your main concern (because, for example, your box controls
    cardiac pacemakers), you can't do without Debian Stable -cleanly installed
    and set up it will run 100% stable- guaranteeed. That's why it is used in
    mission critical surroundings."

    http://sidux.com/index.php?module=pnWikka&tag=whysidux




  2. Re: Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

    On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:51:47 -0400, DFS wrote:

    > "If stability is your main concern (because, for example, your box controls
    > cardiac pacemakers), you can't do without Debian Stable -cleanly installed
    > and set up it will run 100% stable- guaranteeed. That's why it is used in
    > mission critical surroundings."
    >
    > http://sidux.com/index.php?module=pnWikka&tag=whysidux


    Yea.
    Mission critical in this case probably means spamming lies to Usenet 24x7
    like Spamowitz does.

    --
    Moshe Goldfarb
    Collector of soaps from around the globe.
    Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
    http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

  3. Re: Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

    "DFS" writes:

    > "If stability is your main concern (because, for example, your box controls
    > cardiac pacemakers), you can't do without Debian Stable -cleanly installed
    > and set up it will run 100% stable- guaranteeed. That's why it is used in
    > mission critical surroundings."
    >
    > http://sidux.com/index.php?module=pnWikka&tag=whysidux


    Yup. Another poster who doesn't know what "stable" means. It could
    almost be HPT.

    If they were to say it will run "the same" as in tests then fine - they
    can tweak and mix and match things so it will run stable for the
    tasks. But this constant "its runs 100% stable" theory is tiresome. It
    doesn't - there are loads of *documented* bugs there that will not get
    fixed ever in that distro unless you choose to update them from testing
    or unstable.

  4. Re: Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

    On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:54:39 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:

    > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:51:47 -0400, DFS wrote:
    >
    >> "If stability is your main concern (because, for example, your box
    >> controls cardiac pacemakers), you can't do without Debian Stable
    >> -cleanly installed and set up it will run 100% stable- guaranteeed.
    >> That's why it is used in mission critical surroundings."
    >>
    >> http://sidux.com/index.php?module=pnWikka&tag=whysidux

    >
    > Yea.
    > Mission critical in this case probably means spamming lies to Usenet
    > 24x7 like Spamowitz does.


    .... or it means mission critical ....

    --
    Rick

  5. Re: Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

    Moshe Goldfarb is flatfish (aka: Gary Stewart)

    http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/...arb-troll.html
    http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/...ish-troll.html

    Traits:

    * Nym shifting (see below)
    * Self confessed thief and proud of it
    * Homophobic
    * Racist
    * Habitual liar
    * Frequently cross posts replies to other non-Linux related newsgroups
    * Frequently cross posts articles originally not posted to COLA

  6. Re: Linux lusers lying: "Debian Stable is 100% stable - guaranteed"

    On 2008-04-15, Hadron wrote:
    > "DFS" writes:
    >
    >> "If stability is your main concern (because, for example, your box controls
    >> cardiac pacemakers), you can't do without Debian Stable -cleanly installed
    >> and set up it will run 100% stable- guaranteeed. That's why it is used in
    >> mission critical surroundings."
    >>
    >> http://sidux.com/index.php?module=pnWikka&tag=whysidux

    >
    > Yup. Another poster who doesn't know what "stable" means. It could
    > almost be HPT.


    ....let this fellow fork to his hearts content and he's made harmless
    by the fact that he's off by himself only visible to the rest of the
    world because Lemmings are despearate to somehow cast Linux in a bad
    light.

    This is the plus side of the "freedom to innovate" in Linux.

    He's far away from the real Debian.

    >
    > If they were to say it will run "the same" as in tests then fine - they
    > can tweak and mix and match things so it will run stable for the
    > tasks. But this constant "its runs 100% stable" theory is tiresome. It
    > doesn't - there are loads of *documented* bugs there that will not get
    > fixed ever in that distro unless you choose to update them from testing
    > or unstable.



    --
    OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
    / | \

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

+ Reply to Thread