Hadron wrote:

> chrisv writes:
>
>> Gregory Shearman wrote:
>>
>>> Hadron snotted:
>>>>
>>> Now, let's put the context back in.
>>>
>>>> That might be ok for people like Gregory Shearman who stated that it's
>>>> a waste of time implementing a consistent User Interface since users
>>>> can damn well find out where things are easy enough (really!), but its
>>>> not ok for many.
>>>
>>>> Poor Gregory. As rude as he wants to people. Calling people "stupid" if
>>>> they cant or dont want to deal with a fragmented UI but gets his
>>>> panties in a bunch when called on it.
>>>
>>> Now where's the ****ing reference you lying ****?
>>>
>>>> You lose this one I guess.
>>>
>>> Pretend all you like, you can't misrepresent my words and then pretend
>>> to "win".
>>>
>>> You're a lying little turd.
>>>
>>>> I wont bother linking. Shearman knows its true. Snit might if he has
>>>> the time I dare say since I think he has already referenced it.
>>>
>>> Of course you won't bother linking, you lying, stinking little turd.
>>
>> "Hadron" runs-away while pissing his pants again, I suppose. LOL
>>
>
> Poor chrisv. The link and the text were indeed posted. Now off you go
> and cry.
>

The link shows exactly what a misrepresenting little lying **** you are,
Quark.

**** you.

--
Regards,

Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> Just like he did when challenged (in another group) to post a link to any of
>> his OSS applications "I contribute to OSS". AFAIK they're still waiting.
>
> Oh, Hadron has written some software? Cool! What does it do and where can I
> find copies?

We don't know yet.

> Come on, Hadron... your friends in COLA can't wait to give your software a
> test drive. How about a link, ole buddy?

They're waiting in alt.os.linux.ubuntu too...

--
Mandriva - 2008.1 - RC2 - 64bit OS.
COLA trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/

Gregory Shearman wrote:

>>> "Hadron" runs-away while pissing his pants again, I suppose. LOL
>>
>> Poor chrisv. The link and the text were indeed posted. Now off you go
>> and cry.
>
> The link shows exactly what a misrepresenting little lying **** you are,
> Quark.

Yep. Quack's yellow stream must be filling-up his shoes, by now. 8)

William Poaster wrote:

> We don't know yet.

He says he can't tell us, for some reason.
--
Regards,
[tv]

...."6, uh... what was that number again?": Number of the Blonde Beast

Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> We don't know yet.
>
> He says he can't tell us, for some reason.

Really, he can't prove what he claims? Are you surprised the wintroll can't back
up his claims? Quack wouldn't be lying, would he...

--
Mandriva - 2008.1 - RC2 - 64bit OS.
COLA trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/

Tattoo Vampire writes:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> We don't know yet.
>
> He says he can't tell us, for some reason.

We all know how quick you are to show off about your silly job titles
and your Linux evangelism. However, experience refrains me from posting
too much. But I have posted some before. Only a complete idiot, and it
appears you might qualify, would be blind to my previous postings and my
Ubuntu postings on this subject.

Frankly, I'm not going to have a pissing competition with Willy Poaster
and a moron like Gregory Shearman who has openly stated that designing
and implementing consistent UIs is a waste of a programmers time and
effort.


--
Thinking is dangerous. It leads to ideas.
-- Seen on #Debian

Hadron wrote:

> We

Who's "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket?
--
Regards,
[tv]

....The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

Tattoo Vampire writes:

> Hadron wrote:
>
>> We
>
> Who's "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket?

"We" being everyone you tell about your job. Unless you think there is
only me here? Mind you, in COLA it wouldn't surprise me since Roy and
Mark have driven most of the real advocates away.

And stop snipping. It's not big (steady Marti) or clever.

--
I thought you had a CS degree? And you never did a compiler course? I am
amazed! - Hadron Quark, COLA
Really? Why are you amazed? Do you think computer science courses include courses on writing
compilers too? REALLY? - Andrew "Spike1" Halliwell BSc CS, COLA
-- COLA where they put the lunacy in Advocacy.

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:30:46 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire writes:
>
>> William Poaster wrote:
>>
>>> We don't know yet.
>>
>> He says he can't tell us, for some reason.
>
> We all know how quick you are to show off about your silly job titles
> and your Linux evangelism. However, experience refrains me from posting
> too much. But I have posted some before. Only a complete idiot, and it
> appears you might qualify, would be blind to my previous postings and my
> Ubuntu postings on this subject.
>
> Frankly, I'm not going to have a pissing competition with Willy Poaster
> and a moron like Gregory Shearman who has openly stated that designing
> and implementing consistent UIs is a waste of a programmers time and
> effort.

"We all". How many are you speaking for?

--
Rick

Hadron wrote:

> "We" being everyone you tell about your job. Unless you think there is
> only me here? Mind you, in COLA it wouldn't surprise me since Roy and
> Mark have driven most of the real advocates away.

Hadron, you pissy little bitch. I post a few times about my job and how I
moved the company away from Windows and you accuse me of showing off. At the
same time you CONTINUOUSLY boast of being a true Linux advocate and
CONTINUOUSLY brag about how you've contributed to OSS. Oh, the irony.

--
Regards,
[tv]

....A running chicken is poultry in motion.

Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

Tattoo Vampire writes:

> Hadron wrote:
>
>> "We" being everyone you tell about your job. Unless you think there is
>> only me here? Mind you, in COLA it wouldn't surprise me since Roy and
>> Mark have driven most of the real advocates away.
>
> Hadron, you pissy little bitch. I post a few times about my job and
> how I

Actually no. You pranced around a lot telling us how you dictated what
apps they used and how you were the marketing director too. Touch a nerve?

> moved the company away from Windows and you accuse me of showing off. At the
> same time you CONTINUOUSLY boast of being a true Linux advocate and
> CONTINUOUSLY brag about how you've contributed to OSS. Oh, the irony.

No, I dont "continually". You bring it up with your silly "what projects"
queries. I contribute much more back the OSS community than most of COLA
put together. I dont know if you contribute or just take - thats your
business.

--
- "Just think, consumers are not sold on XP, and Microsoft shelled out
some major $$$ to develop this thing. This is a great opportunity for
alternative operating systems to intercept the ball, and run it back for a
touchdown."
comp.os.linux.advocacy - where they put the lunacy in advocacy

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:38:23 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire writes:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> We
>>
>> Who's "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket?
>
> "We" being everyone you tell about your job. Unless you think there is
> only me here? Mind you, in COLA it wouldn't surprise me since Roy and
> Mark have driven most of the real advocates away.
>
> And stop snipping. It's not big (steady Marti) or clever.

With some of the people in this group, one has to wonder where the
mouse/gerbil really is.

Hint: it's not in his pocket.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Hadron wrote:

> Actually no. You pranced around a lot telling us how you dictated what
> apps they used and how you were the marketing director too. Touch a nerve?

I don't prance and you didn't touch a nerve. I might ask you the same thing
given your rather overblown reaction to what I wrote. :-P
--
Regards,
[tv]

....Circular Definition: see Definition, Circular.

Owner/Proprietor, Cheesus Crust Pizza Company
Good to the last supper

Gregory Shearman wrote:

>Not drunk, not stupid or deluded..

I don't know why you don't KF the POS...

chrisv wrote:

> Gregory Shearman wrote:
>
>>Not drunk, not stupid or deluded..
>
> I don't know why you don't KF the POS...

I saw in your other post that you KF'ed him. Good move. He's so
blatantly, shamelessly dishonest that nothing he writes is deserving of
consideration or rebuttal.

On 2008-03-27, Hadron wrote:
> Moshe Goldfarb writes:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:09:15 -0000, Rick wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:11:20 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>>> Most casual image fiddlers will probably only need 10% of what the
>>>> express version gives.
>>>
>>> Then they should be able to use Gimp.
>
> But they wont as Gimp is relatively tricky to use. You missed my

For a guy like you ANY image manipulation isn't just relatively
tricky, it is simply BEYOND YOU. The fact that Photoshop/GIMP is an
interface you don't already know is just background noise.

> point. Most users do not need a well featured piece of SW like
> gimp. They might have used it before now, but now there is this? I doubt
> it.
>


--
NO! There are no CODICILES of Fight Club! |||
/ | \
That way leads to lawyers and business megacorps and credit cards!

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

JEDIDIAH writes:

> On 2008-03-27, Hadron wrote:
>> Moshe Goldfarb writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:09:15 -0000, Rick wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:11:20 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Most casual image fiddlers will probably only need 10% of what the
>>>>> express version gives.
>>>>
>>>> Then they should be able to use Gimp.
>>
>> But they wont as Gimp is relatively tricky to use. You missed my
>
> For a guy like you ANY image manipulation isn't just relatively
> tricky, it is simply BEYOND YOU. The fact that Photoshop/GIMP is an
> interface you don't already know is just background noise.

What are you talking about? I have openly recommended Gimp as a great
OSS program many times. I use it daily. it doesn't mean its easy to get
to grips with though. It doesn't mean I use 100% of its
functionality. It doesn't mean I think its UI is perfect for beginners.

Your problem is that you're too iedalistic to judge things on their merits
and their potential target audience. My opinion on a program "for me" is
not necessarily the same as my opinion on a program for nOObs to
Linux. But I dont expect you to understand that since for most COLA
advocates its all "me, me, me" and "meets MY needs". A selfish crowd.

--
If you are going to run a rinky-dink distro made by a couple of
volunteers, why not run a rinky-dink distro made by a lot of volunteers?
-- Jaldhar H. Vyas on debian-devel

chrisv wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Gregory Shearman wrote:
>>
>>>Not drunk, not stupid or deluded..
>>
>> I don't know why you don't KF the POS...
>
> I saw in your other post that you KF'ed him. Good move. He's so
> blatantly, shamelessly dishonest that nothing he writes is deserving of
> consideration or rebuttal.

No doubt Quack will now bleat the usual troll's mantra about "censorship"
& "free speech" etc. What a mar00n.

--
Mandriva - 2008.1 - RC2 - 64bit OS.
COLA trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/

On 2008-03-31, Hadron wrote:
> JEDIDIAH writes:
>
>> On 2008-03-27, Hadron wrote:
>>> Moshe Goldfarb writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:09:15 -0000, Rick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:11:20 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Most casual image fiddlers will probably only need 10% of what the
>>>>>> express version gives.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then they should be able to use Gimp.
>>>
>>> But they wont as Gimp is relatively tricky to use. You missed my
>>
>> For a guy like you ANY image manipulation isn't just relatively
>> tricky, it is simply BEYOND YOU. The fact that Photoshop/GIMP is an
>> interface you don't already know is just background noise.
>
> What are you talking about? I have openly recommended Gimp as a great
> OSS program many times. I use it daily. it doesn't mean its easy to get
> to grips with though. It doesn't mean I use 100% of its
> functionality. It doesn't mean I think its UI is perfect for beginners.
>
> Your problem is that you're too iedalistic to judge things on their merits
> and their potential target audience. My opinion on a program "for me" is

Not at all.

I actually KNOW professional artists. I've watched them work and
I have some fine arts training myself so I can appreciate the inherent
difficulty of their work.

> not necessarily the same as my opinion on a program for nOObs to
> Linux. But I dont expect you to understand that since for most COLA
> advocates its all "me, me, me" and "meets MY needs". A selfish crowd.
>

No, you are the self-centered one that can't imagine anyone
with needs different than his own.

--
NO! There are no CODICILES of Fight Club! |||
/ | \
That way leads to lawyers and business megacorps and credit cards!

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com