Re: [One again Roy Schestowitz Distorts a "News" story] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent (was: [News] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent) - Linux

This is a discussion on Re: [One again Roy Schestowitz Distorts a "News" story] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent (was: [News] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent) - Linux ; On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:19:25 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote: > Hyper-V isnĘt the only Windows Server 2008 virtualization solution thatĘs > lagging No, Roy. The article says "products from Microsoft's COMPETITORS AND PARTNERS aren't 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Re: [One again Roy Schestowitz Distorts a "News" story] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent (was: [News] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent)

  1. Re: [One again Roy Schestowitz Distorts a "News" story] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent (was: [News] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent)

    On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:19:25 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

    > Hyper-V isnĘt the only Windows Server 2008 virtualization solution thatĘs
    > lagging


    No, Roy. The article says "products from Microsoft's COMPETITORS AND
    PARTNERS aren't 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this point."

    Yet you try to make this sound like Microsoft's competitors not being ready
    = more than just Hyper-V not being ready.

    > ,----[ Quote ]
    >| But itĘs not just MicrosoftĘs own Hyper-V that isnĘt quite ready for
    >| prime-time. Several other virtualization products from MicrosoftĘs
    >| competitors and partners arenĘt 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this
    >| point.
    > `----
    >
    > http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1225
    >
    > The "Ow!" starts again.


    You have no idea what you're talking about.

  2. Re: [One again Roy Schestowitz Distorts a "News" story] [Rival] Windows Server 2008 Delivered Incomplete, Pointless to an Extent

    On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:15:11 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

    > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:19:25 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
    >
    >> Hyper-V isnĘt the only Windows Server 2008 virtualization solution thatĘs
    >> lagging

    >
    > No, Roy. The article says "products from Microsoft's COMPETITORS AND
    > PARTNERS aren't 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this point."
    >
    > Yet you try to make this sound like Microsoft's competitors not being ready
    > = more than just Hyper-V not being ready.
    >
    >> ,----[ Quote ]
    >>| But itĘs not just MicrosoftĘs own Hyper-V that isnĘt quite ready for
    >>| prime-time. Several other virtualization products from MicrosoftĘs
    >>| competitors and partners arenĘt 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this
    >>| point.
    >> `----
    >>
    >> http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1225
    >>
    >> The "Ow!" starts again.

    >
    > You have no idea what you're talking about.


    See Roy Schestowitz.

    See Roy Schestowitz run..

    Once again, the people of COLA can't be so ignorant that they don't see
    what this Schestowitz clown is up to.

    Can they?


    --
    Moshe Goldfarb
    Collector of soaps from around the globe.
    Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
    http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

+ Reply to Thread