On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:15:11 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:19:25 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Hyper-V isn¢t the only Windows Server 2008 virtualization solution that¢s
>> lagging
>
> No, Roy. The article says "products from Microsoft's COMPETITORS AND
> PARTNERS aren't 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this point."
>
> Yet you try to make this sound like Microsoft's competitors not being ready
> = more than just Hyper-V not being ready.
>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| But it¢s not just Microsoft¢s own Hyper-V that isn¢t quite ready for
>>| prime-time. Several other virtualization products from Microsoft¢s
>>| competitors and partners aren¢t 100-percent enterprise-ready, either, at this
>>| point.
>> `----
>>
>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1225
>>
>> The "Ow!" starts again.
>
> You have no idea what you're talking about.

See Roy Schestowitz.

See Roy Schestowitz run..

Once again, the people of COLA can't be so ignorant that they don't see
what this Schestowitz clown is up to.

Can they?


--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/