Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista (was: [News] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista) - Linux

This is a discussion on Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista (was: [News] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista) - Linux ; On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:20:14 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote: > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2192546,00.asp This article is 3 months old. Why are you digging up the past and claiming it's "news"?...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista (was: [News] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista)

  1. Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista (was: [News] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista)

    On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:20:14 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

    > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2192546,00.asp


    This article is 3 months old. Why are you digging up the past and claiming
    it's "news"?

  2. Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista

    On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:53:05 -0600, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

    > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:20:14 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
    >
    >> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2192546,00.asp

    >
    > This article is 3 months old. Why are you digging up the past and claiming
    > it's "news"?


    Looks like Roy's SPAM Script has had a moment.....

  3. Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista (was: [News] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista)


    "Erik Funkenbusch" wrote in message
    news:s9zs7p1rma1a$.dlg@funkenbusch.com...
    > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:20:14 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
    >
    >> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2192546,00.asp

    >
    > This article is 3 months old. Why are you digging up the past and
    > claiming
    > it's "news"?


    Roy Schestowitz needs to get paid. He's hoping that his masters continue to
    pay him and they don't notice that he's posting old articles.




    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


  4. Re: [Roy Schestowitz keeps pulling ancient crap out of his ass] [Rival] Lackluster Response to Service Pack 1 of Windows Vista

    On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:18:21 -0500, Ephraim Moog wrote:

    > "Erik Funkenbusch" wrote in message
    > news:s9zs7p1rma1a$.dlg@funkenbusch.com...
    >> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:20:14 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
    >>
    >>> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2192546,00.asp

    >>
    >> This article is 3 months old. Why are you digging up the past and
    >> claiming
    >> it's "news"?

    >
    > Roy Schestowitz needs to get paid. He's hoping that his masters continue to
    > pay him and they don't notice that he's posting old articles.


    And so it appears.

    His postings are starting to look like:

    Ubuntu "fill in the application here" version 0.1.2 released.
    And then 2 days later:
    Ubuntu "fill in the application here" version 0.1.3 released.

    and so forth.

    Roy gets paid by quantity not quality.

+ Reply to Thread