information technology specialist .. - Linux

This is a discussion on information technology specialist .. - Linux ; Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: information technology specialist ..

  1. information technology specialist ..

    Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist

    http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

  2. Re: information technology specialist ..

    Doug Mentohl wrote:

    >Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >
    >http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348


    Erik Funybreath: Immoral, dishonest fsck and webmaster.


  3. Re: information technology specialist ..

    * Doug Mentohl fired off this tart reply:

    > Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >
    > http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348


    You're not nice Dougie. But congrats to Erik on the position:

    Webmaster

    * Information Technology Specialist 2
    * Department: Marketing Division

    It's nice to be able to work in areas that you love. (I'm combining
    seriousness and humor here ).

    --
    Tux rox!

  4. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Dec 20, 6:56 am, Doug Mentohl wrote:
    > Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >
    > http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348


    I suppose this information is available to anyone who wants to Google
    Erik, and I suppose that anyone who posts under their real name is in
    for this (Roy Schestowitz for example). But this is really a dirty
    trick (posting someone's personal information). Why don't you leave
    the dirty tricks to the wintrolls? They're more than happy to oblige.

  5. Re: information technology specialist ..

    ____/ nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu on Thursday 20 December 2007 16:02 : \____

    > On Dec 20, 6:56 am, Doug Mentohl wrote:
    >> Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >>
    >> http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

    >
    > I suppose this information is available to anyone who wants to Google
    > Erik, and I suppose that anyone who posts under their real name is in
    > for this (Roy Schestowitz for example). But this is really a dirty
    > trick (posting someone's personal information). Why don't you leave
    > the dirty tricks to the wintrolls? They're more than happy to oblige.


    I agree. Those provocations might be good as response, but let's not aggravate
    Microsoft's paid shills (I've received more E-mails with evidence about
    Microsoft's shilling gigs recently).

    --
    ~~ Best of wishes

    Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: Falsity implies anything
    http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
    http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine

  6. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:56:31 -0800 (PST), Doug Mentohl wrote:

    > Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >
    > http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348


    Lol. What is it you think you've found Duh!g?

    yttrx "found" that information 2 years ago. It wasn't correct then, and
    it's not correct now.

    But that's ok, Duh!g. We know you're Dull, Slow and Stupid. It only takes
    you 2 years longer than anyone else to find information that was already
    out of date then.

    Your "detective" skills are as sharp as your wit, and your intelligence is
    only surpassed by your moral fiber.

  7. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:45:21 -0500, Linonut wrote:

    > * Doug Mentohl fired off this tart reply:
    >
    >> Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >>
    >> http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

    >
    > You're not nice Dougie. But congrats to Erik on the position:
    >
    > Webmaster
    >
    > * Information Technology Specialist 2
    > * Department: Marketing Division
    >
    > It's nice to be able to work in areas that you love. (I'm combining
    > seriousness and humor here ).


    Long since out of date. Go ahead and give the phone number a call. I
    won't answer

  8. Re: information technology specialist ..

    "chrisv" schreef in bericht
    news:t42lm31kt0l9agip1vptvnu0mr0o4rg6le@4ax.com...
    > Doug Mentohl wrote:
    >
    >>Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >>
    >>http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

    >
    > Erik Funybreath: Immoral, dishonest fsck and webmaster.
    >
    >


    *PLANK*






  9. Re: information technology specialist ..

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:02:36 -0800 (PST),
    nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu wrote:
    > On Dec 20, 6:56 am, Doug Mentohl wrote:
    >> Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >>
    >> http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

    >
    > I suppose this information is available to anyone who wants to Google
    > Erik, and I suppose that anyone who posts under their real name is in
    > for this (Roy Schestowitz for example). But this is really a dirty
    > trick (posting someone's personal information). Why don't you leave
    > the dirty tricks to the wintrolls? They're more than happy to oblige.


    agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQFHatXjd90bcYOAWPYRAhKEAJ9Pdl7lE0vSHEnu1VXKKB sKl6kvOQCg5yEZ
    QZAPKiN7VWSiBk82xyVlbvU=
    =CLLa
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --
    Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
    A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking.

  10. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:

    > agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    > exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.


    That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong on
    occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.

  11. Re: information technology specialist ..

    Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

    > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >
    >> agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >> exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    >
    > That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong
    > on occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.


    Yes, Erik, That "dozens of root exploits" was just wrong. And your "update"
    of "half a dozen" was only wrong also. And your backpedaling in small steps
    from that was also just "slightly wrong"

    And the dozens of similar examples where you were just "a little wrong" have
    never been dishonest
    Why exactly are TTF fonts illegal on linux, Erik? You know, that is another
    one of your claims

    You are one of the most dishonest posters *ever* on usenet.
    --
    Just out of curiosity does this actually mean something or have some
    of the few remaining bits of your brain just evaporated?


  12. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:08:38 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

    > Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
    >
    >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >>
    >>> agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >>> exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    >>
    >> That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong
    >> on occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.

    >
    > Yes, Erik, That "dozens of root exploits" was just wrong. And your "update"
    > of "half a dozen" was only wrong also. And your backpedaling in small steps
    > from that was also just "slightly wrong"
    >
    > And the dozens of similar examples where you were just "a little wrong" have
    > never been dishonest
    > Why exactly are TTF fonts illegal on linux, Erik? You know, that is another
    > one of your claims
    >
    > You are one of the most dishonest posters *ever* on usenet.


    As opposed to the times when you claimed there had never been any remotely
    exploitable mime flaws in mutt or pine? Get off your high horse Peter.

    Even if your assertions were valid, which they're not, that would not make
    me anywhere close to "one of the most dishonest posters *ever* on usenet".
    Stop they hyperbole.

  13. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Dec 20, 11:50 pm, Erik Funkenbusch
    wrote:
    > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    > > agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    > > exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    >
    > That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong on
    > occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.


    ****ing liar. You have been a dishonest asshole for years. When you
    aren't being dishonest you spread FUD and / or attempt to divert the
    topic being discussed.

    What about the lie of dozens of root exploits Erik? When called on it
    you said there were only a half dozen or so. The first was 'excusable'
    as an exageration. The second was a LIE. You do it all the time.

    Erik, you are a proven liar.

  14. Re: information technology specialist ..

    Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

    > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:08:38 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
    >
    >> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >>>> exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.
    >>>
    >>> That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong
    >>> on occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know
    >>> it.

    >>
    >> Yes, Erik, That "dozens of root exploits" was just wrong. And your
    >> "update" of "half a dozen" was only wrong also. And your backpedaling in
    >> small steps from that was also just "slightly wrong"
    >>
    >> And the dozens of similar examples where you were just "a little wrong"
    >> have never been dishonest
    >> Why exactly are TTF fonts illegal on linux, Erik? You know, that is
    >> another one of your claims
    >>
    >> You are one of the most dishonest posters *ever* on usenet.

    >
    > As opposed to the times when you claimed there had never been any remotely
    > exploitable mime flaws in mutt or pine? Get off your high horse Peter.


    Except I did not claim any such thing, Erik.
    You are lying *again* now. What about that being "dishonest" part, Erik? You
    are just doing it *again*

    >
    > Even if your assertions were valid, which they're not, that would not make
    > me anywhere close to "one of the most dishonest posters *ever* on usenet".


    Doing your deed for years certainly makes you such a dishonest twit. You
    have been corrected for years, you have been called on your bull**** for
    years, you have been asked for proof of your ridiculous claims for years.
    And you have never stopped being a dishonest FUDster

    Naturally there are even worse posters. Snot and Bill Weisgerber come to
    mind. Hadron Quark tries his very best. But they "best" you just by a very
    small margin

    > Stop they hyperbole.


    Stop being a dishonest swine
    --
    Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. The answer is NO


  15. Re: information technology specialist ..

    * Erik Funkenbusch fired off this tart reply:

    >>> http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

    >
    > Long since out of date. Go ahead and give the phone number a call. I
    > won't answer


    So where are you now?

    --
    Tux rox!

  16. Re: information technology specialist ..

    * Erik Funkenbusch fired off this tart reply:

    > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:56:31 -0800 (PST), Doug Mentohl wrote:
    >
    >> Erik Funkenbusch Webmaster Information Technology Specialist
    >>
    >> http://www.sptc.mnscu.edu/directory/...px?profile=348

    >
    > Lol. What is it you think you've found Duh!g?
    >
    > yttrx "found" that information 2 years ago. It wasn't correct then, and
    > it's not correct now.
    >
    > But that's ok, Duh!g. We know you're Dull, Slow and Stupid. It only takes
    > you 2 years longer than anyone else to find information that was already
    > out of date then.
    >
    > Your "detective" skills are as sharp as your wit, and your intelligence is
    > only surpassed by your moral fiber.



    Merrrrrrrarrrrrrrrrrgh!


    --
    Tux rox!

  17. Re: information technology specialist ..

    Erika wrote:

    >On Dec 20, 11:50 pm, Erik Funkenbusch
    >wrote:
    >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >> > agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >> > exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    >>
    >> That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong on
    >> occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.

    >
    >****ing liar. You have been a dishonest asshole for years. When you
    >aren't being dishonest you spread FUD and / or attempt to divert the
    >topic being discussed.
    >
    >What about the lie of dozens of root exploits Erik? When called on it
    >you said there were only a half dozen or so. The first was 'excusable'
    >as an exageration. The second was a LIE. You do it all the time.
    >
    >Erik, you are a proven liar.


    Indeed he is. He regularly spews crap so illogical that no one in
    their right mind could believe it. The illogical crap is invariably
    anti-Linux, so it can't just be a random brain defect.

    Erik is an immoral, dishonest fsck.


  18. Re: information technology specialist ..

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:50:34 -0500,
    Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
    > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >
    >> agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >> exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    >
    > That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong on
    > occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.



    No, you've have been deliberately misleading and weasel wording on
    several occasions, I call that dishonest.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQFHbAOdd90bcYOAWPYRAnxvAJ9ZBDoBAUAarPXeWYJLHY vsXjbk1QCeIYUL
    mRh/XPXNqtiqQP7/4A9kBoc=
    =SdaO
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --
    Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
    If your voting could really change things, Congress
    would make it illegal.

  19. Re: information technology specialist ..

    On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:19:09 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:

    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA1
    >
    > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:50:34 -0500,
    > Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
    >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >>
    >>> agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >>> exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.

    >>
    >> That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong on
    >> occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know it.

    >
    > No, you've have been deliberately misleading and weasel wording on
    > several occasions, I call that dishonest.


    No, i'd call that a bias in interpreting my comments. You and others
    choose to use the most inflamatory and controversial interpretation
    possible of anything I say.

    Can you give an example?

  20. Re: information technology specialist ..

    Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

    > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:19:09 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >
    >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    >> Hash: SHA1
    >>
    >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:50:34 -0500,
    >> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
    >>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Jim Richardson wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> agree pretty much 100%, Erik can be a complete asshole, and he's not
    >>>> exactly honest here, but that's a silly thing to do.
    >>>
    >>> That's bull. I have been completely honest here. Sure, i've been wrong
    >>> on occasion, but to call that being dishonest is bull**** and you know
    >>> it.

    >>
    >> No, you've have been deliberately misleading and weasel wording on
    >> several occasions, I call that dishonest.

    >
    > No, i'd call that a bias in interpreting my comments. You and others
    > choose to use the most inflamatory and controversial interpretation
    > possible of anything I say.
    >
    > Can you give an example?


    Take about any of your posts of the last years
    --
    I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast