-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:35:02 -0800
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:


> "William Poaster" wrote

> > As linux does not *have* any defragging tools, WHY can't the
> > windoze defragger
> > defrag the linux partition?

>
> It can. You just use the format command.


Time waster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHO3c04dyr7s6PRYgRAoz6AJ4heVEsjwJ3wx3+vhw1An u8Cf2iGwCeIH1h
fWXoUUhKnSGoVTHzyRIAHfc=
=e6GC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ed wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:35:02 -0800
> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:
>
>> "William Poaster" wrote
>> > As linux does not *have* any defragging tools, WHY can't the
>> > windoze defragger
>> > defrag the linux partition?
>>
>> It can. You just use the format command.
>
> Time waster

Yes, another idiot troll.

--
Operating systems: FreeBSD 6.2 (64bit), PC-BSD 1.4,
Testing: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 2
Linux systems: Kubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy" amd64,
Debian 4.0, PCLinuxOS 2007.

____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:19 : \____

> ed wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:35:02 -0800
>> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:
>>
>>> "William Poaster" wrote
>>> > As linux does not *have* any defragging tools, WHY can't the
>>> > windoze defragger
>>> > defrag the linux partition?
>>>
>>> It can. You just use the format command.
>>
>> Time waster
>
> Yes, another idiot troll.

Just don't feed that raving lunatic. The guy used to repeatedly call for
slitting the throats of 'lintads'. People like that should be detained, not be
out on USENET.

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Download Othello: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:19 : \____
>
>> ed wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:35:02 -0800
>>> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:
>>>
>>>> "William Poaster" wrote
>>>> > As linux does not *have* any defragging tools, WHY can't the
>>>> > windoze defragger
>>>> > defrag the linux partition?
>>>>
>>>> It can. You just use the format command.
>>>
>>> Time waster
>>
>> Yes, another idiot troll.
>
> Just don't feed that raving lunatic. The guy used to repeatedly call for
> slitting the throats of 'lintads'. People like that should be detained, not be
> out on USENET.

I'm not feeding it. I only see replies to it.

--
Operating systems: FreeBSD 6.2 (64bit), PC-BSD 1.4,
Testing: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 2
Linux systems: Kubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy" amd64,
Debian 4.0, PCLinuxOS 2007.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:32:49 -0800
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:


> "William Poaster" wrote

> > Yes, another idiot troll.

>
> main(){printf(&linux["\007\114%sux\013\0"],(linux)["friendly"]+"penguin"-0x6d);}
>
>


Misinformed. That's not going to compile, even if it did, it's the
worst coding ever. That would probably be allowed in some companies
that don't care about maintenance, but for opensource, it'd probably be
revoked.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHO5Ch4dyr7s6PRYgRAvf+AJwMKcMaowGrceA2KeQPWE TRqi7CswCeKb8D
5MPX4EwBwg8anYPzsQuGQzA=
=oPmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, ed

wrote
on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:21:11 GMT
<20071115001945.76de2ff5@workstation>:
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:32:49 -0800
> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:
>
>> "William Poaster" wrote
>> > Yes, another idiot troll.
>>
>> main(){printf(&linux["\007\114%sux\013\0"],(linux)["friendly"]+"penguin"-0x6d);}
>>
>>
>
> Misinformed. That's not going to compile, even if it did, it's the
> worst coding ever.

Then you've not looked at Jeff "Question Mark" Relf's
contributions to newsreaders :-). It used to be at

http://www.cotse.net/users/jeffrelf/X.CPP

but Mr. Relf has subsequently apparently moved it
into a Games.ZIP archive.

The best thing I can say for it is that it has no
documentation.

> That would probably be allowed in some companies
> that don't care about maintenance,

Assuming it worked. At least JR's crap is marginally
functional on Windows equipment (according to him).

> but for opensource, it'd probably be revoked.

If not shot on sight and buried in peat moss for 3 months.

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Insert random misquote here.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:58 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:19 : \____
>>
>>> ed wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:35:02 -0800
>>>> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "William Poaster" wrote
>>>>> > As linux does not *have* any defragging tools, WHY can't the
>>>>> > windoze defragger
>>>>> > defrag the linux partition?
>>>>>
>>>>> It can. You just use the format command.
>>>>
>>>> Time waster
>>>
>>> Yes, another idiot troll.
>>
>> Just don't feed that raving lunatic. The guy used to repeatedly call for
>> slitting the throats of 'lintads'. People like that should be detained, not
>> be out on USENET.
>
> I'm not feeding it. I only see replies to it.

Yes, I've begun seeing 'dirty' content in some posts from Ed.

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: 12345679 x 8 = 98765432
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1510068k total, 715048k used, 795020k free, 56736k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:58 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:19 : \____



>>> Just don't feed that raving lunatic. The guy used to repeatedly call for
>>> slitting the throats of 'lintads'. People like that should be detained, not
>>> be out on USENET.
>>
>> I'm not feeding it. I only see replies to it.
>
> Yes, I've begun seeing 'dirty' content in some posts from Ed.

I don't see any replies to the troll now, as they weren't worth reading
anyway. :-)

--
Operating systems: FreeBSD 6.2 (64bit), PC-BSD 1.4,
Testing: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 2
Linux systems: Kubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy" amd64,
Debian 4.0, PCLinuxOS 2007.

After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:58 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 14 November 2007 23:19 : \____
>>>
>>>> ed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:35:02 -0800
>>>>> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "William Poaster" wrote
>>>>>> > As linux does not *have* any defragging tools, WHY can't the
>>>>>> > windoze defragger
>>>>>> > defrag the linux partition?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It can. You just use the format command.
>>>>>
>>>>> Time waster
>>>>
>>>> Yes, another idiot troll.
>>>
>>> Just don't feed that raving lunatic. The guy used to repeatedly call for
>>> slitting the throats of 'lintads'. People like that should be detained, not
>>> be out on USENET.
>>
>> I'm not feeding it. I only see replies to it.
>
> Yes, I've begun seeing 'dirty' content in some posts from Ed.

You guys are feeding it, too .

I feel sorry for that guy, though. To have a life so pathetic, reduced
to trolling a ng set up to be a troll magnet. Tsk tsk.

--
Tux rox!