He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
-157. Good going, Roy.
Printable View
He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
-157. Good going, Roy.
Tim Funkenbusch Quark wrote:
[color=blue]
> He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
> -157. Good going, Roy.[/color]
Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?
--
You're not my type. For that matter, you're not even my species
On Nov 8, 3:22 am, Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlm...@t-online.de> wrote:[color=blue]
> Tim Funkenbusch Quark wrote:[color=green]
> > He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
> > -157. Good going, Roy.[/color]
>
> Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?[/color]
But you're just a bundle of sunshine aren't you?
____/ Peter Köhlmann on Thursday 08 November 2007 08:22 : \____
[color=blue]
> Tim Funkenbusch Quark wrote:
>[color=green]
>> He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
>> -157. Good going, Roy.[/color]
>
> Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?[/color]
'Tim Funkenbusch Quark' (user harlowmonekys in Digg... yes, he nymshifts) is on
my blocklist. From what I was able to gather, he uses the site not to read
news. He navigates by stalking my comment and submissions (there are APIs and
feeds for that), then modding them many of down. He admitted doing that
blindly and systematically. Flatfish+nyms and a couple of others recently
joined him. The only time they would ever leave a comment is to smear, to
spread libel, and to attack my comment and/or submissions. Flatfish already
had at least 4 accounts terminated when I complained. He had his comments
deleted as well, which is ultra rare.
Tim seems to know much better what is happening in my account in Digg (the
trolls used to post some statistics here) and I imagine that the score he
mentions above (I don't know what the comment is) is one of those where a
~10-line sig is appended to protest against Digg staff for not banning the
COLA trolls (yet), who do nothing but attack me (don't be misled. When they
are not in COLA they do their shilling elsewhere). Anyway, not everyone is
happy with that protest of mine -- a protest against slander and systematic
modding down on my contributions (silencing attempts), so I'm modded down.
They did the same thing to the profile in Google Groups.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Othello for Win32/Linux: [url]http://othellomaster.com[/url]
[url]http://Schestowitz.com[/url] | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
11:20:01 up 8 days, 15:31, 3 users, load average: 0.10, 0.44, 0.59
[url]http://iuron.com[/url] - Open Source knowledge engine project
On 2007-11-08, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> 'Tim Funkenbusch Quark' (user harlowmonekys in Digg... yes, he nymshifts) is on[/color]
Wrong, of course. Do you actually know what nymshifting is? Evidently
not.
[color=blue]
> my blocklist. From what I was able to gather, he uses the site not to read
> news. He navigates by stalking my comment and submissions (there are APIs and
> feeds for that), then modding them many of down. He admitted doing that
> blindly and systematically. Flatfish+nyms and a couple of others recently[/color]
Strike two. For one week, I tried to mod every one of your comments
down, to check your claim that it would take hours a day to do that. I
determined that it would take about 5 minutes a day, tops, and thus
determined that your claims that your poor performance on Digg must be
due to people being paid to bury were you were unsupported by the
evidence.
....[color=blue]
> Tim seems to know much better what is happening in my account in Digg (the[/color]
I know how to use a web site that reports Digg stats by user. That's
how I know that of your last 50 comments, you got an average of 2.42
positive ratings (including the rating of 1 a comment starts with), and
6.92 negative ratings, for a net of -4.5.
Interestingly, everyone you claim is a troll there to stalk you has a
net positive rating. Furthermore, you tend to do worse on stories that
get popular, and thus have more exposure to the general Digg population.
[color=blue]
> trolls used to post some statistics here) and I imagine that the score he
> mentions above (I don't know what the comment is) is one of those where a
> ~10-line sig is appended to protest against Digg staff for not banning the
> COLA trolls (yet), who do nothing but attack me (don't be misled. When they
> are not in COLA they do their shilling elsewhere). Anyway, not everyone is
> happy with that protest of mine -- a protest against slander and systematic
> modding down on my contributions (silencing attempts), so I'm modded down.
> They did the same thing to the profile in Google Groups.[/color]
Roy, you get dugg down on Digg becuase, among other reasons, you post
inaccurate information, you post off-topic information (pretty much
everything you post in the windows section, for example), you post
identical comments to multiple stories (it is called spam, Roy, and Digg
users don't like spam), you post many links to your own sites (but
criticize others who post links to their own sites), you call anyone
who disgrees with you a shill, and you appear to use automated software
to do some of your posting (and it is buggy software).
After takin' a swig o' grog, Peter Köhlmann belched out this bit o' wisdom:
[color=blue]
> Tim Funkenbusch Quark wrote:
>[color=green]
>> He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
>> -157. Good going, Roy.[/color]
>
> Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?[/color]
Roy seems to attract a lot of attention. They want to drag him down.
--
Tux rox!
On 2007-11-08, cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Nov 8, 3:22 am, Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlm...@t-online.de> wrote:[color=green]
>> Tim Funkenbusch Quark wrote:[color=darkred]
>> > He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
>> > -157. Good going, Roy.[/color]
>>
>> Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?[/color]
>
> But you're just a bundle of sunshine aren't you?[/color]
He makes a valid point.
--
(o< |)
//\ ..may the beacon /\obt.
V_/_ pass you by.. /\/\iller
10:40am up 25 days 23:17, 22 users, load average: 0.66, 0.65, 0.63
processes 1181475
Linonut <linonut@be11south.net> writes:
[color=blue]
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Peter Köhlmann belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>[color=green]
>> Tim Funkenbusch Quark wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> He's got a Digg comment with 8 votes up, 165 votes down, for a net of
>>> -157. Good going, Roy.[/color]
>>
>> Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?[/color]
>
> Roy seems to attract a lot of attention. They want to drag him down.[/color]
because
a) He's a spammer
b) invariably wrong
c) a nasty piece of work when cornered who threatens physical violence.
d) a link plagiarist who denies the source sites from hit count by
copying their work
oh. and
e) A liar who manipulates headlines to suit himself and generate as many
links to his sites which generate revenue.
To his credit he does "design" super search engines...
[url]http://www.chabotspace.org/vsc/exhibits/ws/images/robotsam.gif[/url]
*chuckle*
--
Ignore previous fortune.
On Nov 8, 8:19 am, Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@mouse-potato.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> On 2007-11-08, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > 'Tim Funkenbusch Quark' (user harlowmonekys in Digg... yes, he nymshifts) is on[/color]
>
> Wrong, of course. Do you actually know what nymshifting is? Evidently
> not.[/color]
What professional SPAMMER does know?
[color=blue][color=green]
> > my blocklist. From what I was able to gather, he uses the site not to read
> > news. He navigates by stalking my comment and submissions (there are APIs and
> > feeds for that), then modding them many of down. He admitted doing that
> > blindly and systematically. Flatfish+nyms and a couple of others recently[/color]
>
> Strike two. For one week, I tried to mod every one of your comments
> down, to check your claim that it would take hours a day to do that. I
> determined that it would take about 5 minutes a day, tops, and thus
> determined that your claims that your poor performance on Digg must be
> due to people being paid to bury were you were unsupported by the
> evidence.[/color]
People are on to Roy Schestowitz over on digg and Roy doesn't like it
so he goes crying like a baby to the admins.
Read some of the comments by people.
How the hell can he reach -157 with just a couple of COLA trolls
burying him?
It's not possible.
The real truth, and what Roy is hoping will be steam rolled, is that
Roy is a very unlikeable person over on digg.
People have Roy figured out and can vote with their opinion, unlike
over in COLA where he floods the place whenever he wants and has his
ignorant choir defend him.
That doesn't work on digg.[color=blue]
> ...
>[color=green]
> > Tim seems to know much better what is happening in my account in Digg (the[/color]
>
> I know how to use a web site that reports Digg stats by user. That's
> how I know that of your last 50 comments, you got an average of 2.42
> positive ratings (including the rating of 1 a comment starts with), and
> 6.92 negative ratings, for a net of -4.5.[/color]
Where is this website?
It seems like an interesting place.
[color=blue]
> Interestingly, everyone you claim is a troll there to stalk you has a
> net positive rating. Furthermore, you tend to do worse on stories that
> get popular, and thus have more exposure to the general Digg population.[/color]
Roy is like a person who comes to work with the flu.
The more people he comes in contact with and infects with his parnoid,
narcissistic personality, the more people dislike him.
Digg users are a lot smarter than COLA freaks so Roy can't use his
typical tricks to bury bad press.
[color=blue][color=green]
> > trolls used to post some statistics here) and I imagine that the score he
> > mentions above (I don't know what the comment is) is one of those where a
> > ~10-line sig is appended to protest against Digg staff for not banning the
> > COLA trolls (yet), who do nothing but attack me (don't be misled. When they
> > are not in COLA they do their shilling elsewhere). Anyway, not everyone is
> > happy with that protest of mine -- a protest against slander and systematic
> > modding down on my contributions (silencing attempts), so I'm modded down.
> > They did the same thing to the profile in Google Groups.[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> Roy, you get dugg down on Digg becuase, among other reasons, you post
> inaccurate information, you post off-topic information (pretty much
> everything you post in the windows section, for example), you post
> identical comments to multiple stories (it is called spam, Roy, and Digg
> users don't like spam), you post many links to your own sites (but
> criticize others who post links to their own sites), you call anyone
> who disgrees with you a shill, and you appear to use automated software
> to do some of your posting (and it is buggy software).[/color]
I believe Roy *IS* using automated software and I have reported him to
the digg administrators to have them investigate.
I have sent, amongst other things, time stamped messages from both
COLA, Netscape and digg and have inquired as to how Roy could possibly
be posting all of these messages within minutes of each other to
multiple places if he were not circumventing the system.
This is NOT an attack on Roy Schestowitz in any shape form or fashion
as I believe Roy is as entitled to his opinion as much as anyone else.
Quite unlike Roy himself who believes people that disagree with him
should be sileneced.
Really odd considering he fancies himself an open source freedom
fighter.
That's known as a hypocrite BTW.
The reason Roy's posting is being questioned is because it violates
diggs policy on using automated devices to post and in effect skews
the site which totally goes against what digg is all about.
Time will be the judge as to what digg administration thinks of Roy,
but the evidence for him using robot software to post is overwhelming.
(posted to groups that Roy Frequently SPAMS with his nonsense)
Tim Smith wrote:
[color=blue]
> Strike two ..[/color]
rest of BS deleted ...
After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out this bit o' wisdom:
[color=blue]
> a) He's a spammer[/color]
Here? Not in my view. It is too much material, but much of it is
on-topic in some way.
[color=blue]
> b) invariably wrong[/color]
Sometimes wrong, or hurried.
[color=blue]
> c) a nasty piece of work when cornered who threatens physical violence.[/color]
You have any message-ID to prove that?
Although he's been buckling a bit under the pressure lately, he is far
more polite than most people engaged in the turmoil that is COLA.
[color=blue]
> d) a link plagiarist who denies the source sites from hit count by
> copying their work[/color]
What a stupid concept: make public links, then cry when people use them
or duplicate the material.
Part of the robustness of the internet is its redundancy.
[color=blue]
> oh. and
>
> e) A liar who manipulates headlines to suit himself and generate as many
> links to his sites which generate revenue.[/color]
I usually prefer to go to the other sites in his references.
Roy's posts are, on the balance, a good thing. More selectivity and
reduced volume would be nice.
However, here's the kicker -- Roy is perfectly free to do what goddam
wants to here, just like the more noxious posters such as linux-sux and
clogwog.
--
It's like herding cats!
Tim Smith wrote:
[color=blue]
> He's got ..[/color]
Shouldn't you be patolling slashdot .. :)
After takin' a swig o' grog, Robt. Miller belched out this bit o' wisdom:
[color=blue]
> On 2007-11-08, cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> wrote:[color=green]
>> On Nov 8, 3:22 am, Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlm...@t-online.de> wrote:[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> Given the hatred from you winroll scum in here, you think that's surprising?[/color]
>>
>> But you're just a bundle of sunshine aren't you?[/color]
>
> He makes a valid point.[/color]
[url]http://www.springerlink.com/content/u46m0n1100352258/[/url]
In England, everything that is not prohibited is permitted; in
Germany, everything that is not permitted is prohibited; in France,
everything that is prohibited is permitted; in the USSR everything
that is permitted is prohibited.
Democracy is good, but sausages are better.
--
Tux rox!
Linonut wrote:[color=blue]
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>[color=green]
>> a) He's a spammer[/color][/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>> c) a nasty piece of work when cornered who threatens physical violence.[/color]
>
> You have any message-ID to prove that?[/color]
[url]http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0832be5ef216a3cb?dmode=source&output=gplain[/url]
<jolt.n.pizza@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194547359.104104.144290@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> This is NOT an attack on Roy Schestowitz in any shape form or fashion
> as I believe Roy is as entitled to his opinion as much as anyone else.
> Quite unlike Roy himself who believes people that disagree with him
> should be sileneced.
> Really odd considering he fancies himself an open source freedom
> fighter.
> That's known as a hypocrite BTW.
>[/color]
Far be it from me to defend that guy, but I found a way to make him
inoffensive and even useful here.
Just block his posts and those from the Kent guy. Then you only see topics
that at least one other poster has seen fit to comment upon and you can see
what was worth commenting by opening up thread tops started by the "regular"
poster or if there are only comments by chrisv, Kohlmann, 7, Rick, etc, you
can safely ignore the whole thing. You never see the inflammatory headlines
that way, so you only have to check once in a while to catch all the real
buzz.
For example for today, starting at 12:56AM there are only 5 new topics
showing in my COLA tree and only one by Shestowitz. Since he puts out so
many items, he is somewhat useful in that almost everything under the sun
will be there for some Linux fan to add an "Amen!" to and so show that there
is some ardor to the issue.
"Linonut" <linonut@be11south.net> wrote in message
news:slrnfj6o81.l38.linonut@mlsrock.launchmodem.com...[color=blue]
>
> In England, everything that is not prohibited is permitted; in
> Germany, everything that is not permitted is prohibited; in France,
> everything that is prohibited is permitted; in the USSR everything
> that is permitted is prohibited.
>[/color]
In heaven the Germans are the engineers, the French are the cooks, the
Italians are the lovers, the Swiss are the administrators, and the English
are the police. In hell, The Italians are the engineers, the English are
the cooks, the Swiss are the lovers, the French are the administrators, and
the Germans are the police.
On Nov 8, 2:29 pm, Sharyn Wood <sw...@invalid.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
> Linonut wrote:
>[color=green]
> > After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> a) He's a spammer[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> c) a nasty piece of work when cornered who threatens physical violence.[/color]
> >
> > You have any message-ID to prove that?[/color]
>
> [url]http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0832be5ef21[/url]...[/color]
He sure does seem to have an obsession with castration?
[url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Bcastrate&btnG=Google+Search[/url]
[url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Bcastration&btnG=Search[/url]
Maybe he's a eunuch?
[url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Beunuch&btnG=Search[/url]
That would explain why an apparently healthy (physically, mentally,
well that's questionable) young adult would rather spend his time
patrolling the depths of the Internet than socializing with
friends.Cyber love doesn't count.
It's a free world though. Be all that you can be.
Comment Spammer [email]jolt.n.pizza@gmail.com[/email] using Google-Groups and
Proxy IP 66.110.115.230 from Angola wrote:[color=blue]
> Tim Smith wrote:[color=green]
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> 'Tim Funkenbusch Quark' (user harlowmonekys in Digg...
>>> yes, he nymshifts) is on[/color]
>>
>> Wrong, of course. Do you actually know what nymshifting is?
>> Evidently not.[/color]
>
> What professional SPAMMER does know?
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> my blocklist. From what I was able to gather, he uses the
>>> site not to read news. He navigates by stalking my comment
>>> and submissions (there are APIs and feeds for that), then
>>> modding them many of down. He admitted doing that blindly
>>> and systematically. Flatfish+nyms and a couple of others
>>> recently[/color]
>>
>> Strike two. For one week, I tried to mod every one of your
>> comments down, to check your claim that it would take hours
>> a day to do that. I determined that it would take about 5
>> minutes a day, tops, and thus determined that your claims
>> that your poor performance on Digg must be due to people
>> being paid to bury were you were unsupported by the
>> evidence.[/color]
>
> People are on to Roy Schestowitz over on digg and Roy doesn't
> like it so he goes crying like a baby to the admins. Read some
> of the comments by people. How the hell can he reach -157 with
> just a couple of COLA trolls burying him? It's not possible.
>
> The real truth, and what Roy is hoping will be steam rolled,
> is that Roy is a very unlikeable person over on digg. People
> have Roy figured out and can vote with their opinion, unlike
> over in COLA where he floods the place whenever he wants and
> has his ignorant choir defend him. That doesn't work on digg.[color=green]
>> ...
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Tim seems to know much better what is happening in my
>>> account in Digg (the[/color]
>>
>> I know how to use a web site that reports Digg stats by
>> user. That's how I know that of your last 50 comments, you
>> got an average of 2.42 positive ratings (including the
>> rating of 1 a comment starts with), and 6.92 negative
>> ratings, for a net of -4.5.[/color]
>
> Where is this website? It seems like an interesting place.
>[color=green]
>> Interestingly, everyone you claim is a troll there to stalk
>> you has a net positive rating. Furthermore, you tend to do
>> worse on stories that get popular, and thus have more
>> exposure to the general Digg population.[/color]
>
> Roy is like a person who comes to work with the flu. The more
> people he comes in contact with and infects with his parnoid,
> narcissistic personality, the more people dislike him. Digg
> users are a lot smarter than COLA freaks so Roy can't use his
> typical tricks to bury bad press.[/color]
Narcissist? Paranoid? Sounds like a consistent trait of the
comment spammer that posted this ****e.
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> trolls used to post some statistics here) and I imagine
>>> that the score he mentions above (I don't know what the
>>> comment is) is one of those where a ~10-line sig is
>>> appended to protest against Digg staff for not banning the
>>> COLA trolls (yet), who do nothing but attack me (don't
>>> be misled. When they are not in COLA they do their
>>> shilling elsewhere). Anyway, not everyone is happy with
>>> that protest of mine -- a protest against slander and
>>> systematic modding down on my contributions (silencing
>>> attempts), so I'm modded down. They did the same thing to
>>> the profile in Google Groups.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
>> Roy, you get dugg down on Digg becuase, among other reasons,
>> you post inaccurate information, you post off-topic
>> information (pretty much everything you post in the windows
>> section, for example), you post identical comments to
>> multiple stories (it is called spam, Roy, and Digg users
>> don't like spam), you post many links to your own sites (but
>> criticize others who post links to their own sites), you
>> call anyone who disgrees with you a shill, and you appear to
>> use automated software to do some of your posting (and it is
>> buggy software).[/color]
>
> I believe Roy *IS* using automated software and I have
> reported him to the digg administrators to have them
> investigate. I have sent, amongst other things, time stamped
> messages from both COLA, Netscape and digg and have inquired
> as to how Roy could possibly be posting all of these messages
> within minutes of each other to multiple places if he were not
> circumventing the system.
>
> This is NOT an attack on Roy Schestowitz in any shape form or
> fashion as I believe Roy is as entitled to his opinion as much
> as anyone else. Quite unlike Roy himself who believes people
> that disagree with him should be sileneced. Really odd
> considering he fancies himself an open source freedom fighter.
> That's known as a hypocrite BTW.
>
> The reason Roy's posting is being questioned is because it
> violates diggs policy on using automated devices to post and
> in effect skews the site which totally goes against what digg
> is all about.
>
> Time will be the judge as to what digg administration thinks
> of Roy, but the evidence for him using robot software to post
> is overwhelming.
>
> (posted to groups that Roy Frequently SPAMS with his nonsense)[/color]
Hmmm, Roy posts to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general and
comp.sys.mac.advocacy? Perhaps in response to a cross post,
otherwise it is an interesting lie.
Let's looks at some information on this nymshifting comment spammer:
[url]http://www.projecthoneypot.org/i_1de8d730607b4ce2f11c1010ab6da3e8[/url]
[quote]
IP Address Inspector
66.110.115.230 [Spam Server]
The Project Honey Pot system has detected behavior from the IP
address consistent with that of a mail server and comment
spammer. Below we've reported some other data associated with
this IP. This interrelated data helps map spammers' networks and
aids in law enforcement efforts. If you know something about this
IP, please leave a comment.
Geographic Location [Angola] Angola
IP Characteristics Blocklisted By: SORBS, SpamCop
Spider First Seen approximately 2 months, 1 week ago
Spider Last Seen within 1 week
Spider Sightings 424 visit(s)
First Received From approximately 1 year, 2 months, 1 week ago
Last Received From within 1 year, 2 months, 1 week
Number Received 1 email(s) sent from this IP
First Post On approximately 2 months, 1 week ago
Last Post On within 1 week
Form Posts 289 web post submission(s) sent from this IP
[/quote]
[url]http://www.xenolith0.net/online_proxies.php[/url]
[quote]
Online Proxy Viewer
0 through 100 of 146 Online shown
ISO2 IP:Port HTTP HTTPS Group By External IP Anonymous Added Last
Checked
<SNIP>
Angola 196.202.252.244:80 1 1 66.110.115.230 0 2Sep07 3:27 hours ago
[/quote]
There is one thing common with this comment spammer's and his
buddies (and puppet socks) statements:
[url]http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/[/url]
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
[quote]
17. Don't substantiate your claims. Refuse to present evidence
to support your invalid claims. Repeat your invalid claims and
have your anti-Linux propagandist comrades do the same. Do the
same for any invalid claims that you have notice your anti-Linux
propagandists comrades make.
[/quote]
--
HTP
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:29:32 -0600
Sharyn Wood <swood@invalid.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Linonut wrote:[color=green]
> > After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> a) He's a spammer[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> c) a nasty piece of work when cornered who threatens physical
> >> violence.[/color]
> >
> > You have any message-ID to prove that?[/color]
>
>
> [url]http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0832be5ef216a3cb?dmode=source&output=gplain[/url][/color]
Hum, that's over a year old... hardly material to suggest a continuing
frame of mind.
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:40:30 -0800
[email]ball.****.the.plumber@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
> He sure does seem to have an obsession with castration?
>
> [url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Bcastrate&btnG=Google+Search[/url]
> [url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Bcastration&btnG=Search[/url][/color]
That's not post originating from Roy though, that's stuff from others
containing those search terms.