Hadron wrote:

> spike1@freenet.co.uk writes:
>
>> In the sacred domain of comp.os.linux.advocacy,
>> Almond didnst hastily scribble thusly:
>>> In article <1detv4-g07.ln1@dragon.myth>, Jim Richardson
>>> wrote:
>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>>On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 23:23:34 -0400,
>>>> Enzyte Bob wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Which of the nymshifters are you?
>>
>>> Get lost, you stoopid megalomaniac
>>> with all these PGP bull****.
>>
>>> Who da funk you think you are, mr. jackarse?
>>
>> Awww, what's a matter? Does his use of PGP make it difficult to forge
>> him?
>
> So you verified the signature did you?
>

That's irrelevant

What *is* relevant though that it makes it mightily difficult to forge him

Come on, Hadron Quark, jackass in all trades (and totally clueless too),
show us how to forge him

Idiot
--
If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%?

Mark Kent wrote:

>The feeling is that it was Scott Nudds.

Who knows, who cares? I suspect, and hope, that there's several of
them, all cursed by their own stupidity and worthlessness to wander,
namelessly and pathetically, at least until the day they grow the fsck
up and/or stop taking orders from Redmond.