Oct 25 2007, 01:51 AM
LOL! I had to log in at work to post to this.
After 5.6 years, we give you 100 reasons to switch to Vista.
100 reason after 5.6 years and apple has 300 after 21 months.
Vista is probably a great release for some Windows users, but I'm
I hate that some companies are still having problems developing
drivers for it (CREATIVE!!!!).
I just think Vista is a complete joke.
Mac OSX Leopard:
Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5, or PowerPC G4 (867MHz or
* 512MB of memory
* DVD drive for installation
* 9GB of available disk space
* Some features require a compatible Internet service provider;
fees may apply.
* Some features require Apple's .Mac service; fees apply.
Windows Vista Ultimate:
* 1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
* 1 GB of system memory
* 40 GB hard drive with at least 15 GB of available space
* Support for DirectX 9 graphics with:
o WDDM Driver
o 128 MB of graphics memory (minimum)
o Pixel Shader 2.0 in hardware
o 32 bits per pixel
* Audio Output
* Internet access (fees may apply)
Leopard does WAY MORE and OFFERS more and still doesn't cost and
take as much as Vista to run.
Microsoft has lost lots of it's user base with the disappoint of
I have some questions for Microsoft.
Give me 10 reasons I should give you another 5+ years to
disappoint me again?
If the new iMacs with Leopard can run XP (Only thing someone
really needs to run M$ software) and it's going to be supported
for a few more years (SP3 hopefully SP4), why would someone need
Why would someone care about Windows 7 when Windows Vista was a
disaster and pocket eater? If Vista requires a super computer to
run right, I wonder what type of machine we would need to run the
so-called better Windows 7? Also, how many would have the dough
to fork out for it and the new PC, which I know we would need?
Hmmm.. With Vista, if you have a computer more than 2 years old,
you pretty much need one hell of an upgrade or a new PC. So, with
Windows 7, how old would your computer have to be to run the