Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA? - Linux
This is a discussion on Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA? - Linux ; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
Keith Windsor wrote:
>
> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 ...
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
Keith Windsor wrote:
>
> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>> savings
>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>
>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What distro?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No answer?
>
> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>
> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one) led
> me to assume that it was clear.
>
> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>
Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
apt-cache show tzdata
will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHJ5vxd90bcYOAWPYRAiu6AJ9O2dDIEb+HswgO7YnDJd lQzJwBpgCglF63
yVfc5FsG5b7vu6xyeUTkr+4=
=3to5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Perfection is a goal to be striven for, not a position to be reached.
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
"Jim Richardson" wrote in message
news:hoikv4-hb1.ln1@dragon.myth...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>>> savings
>>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What distro?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No answer?
>>
>> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>>
>> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
>> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one)
>> led
>> me to assume that it was clear.
>>
>> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>>
>
>
> Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
>
> apt-cache show tzdata
>
> will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
Package: tzdata
Priority: required
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 5716
Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers
Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
Architecture: all
Version: 2006m-1ubuntu1
Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales
Filename: pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2006m-1ubuntu1_all.deb
Size: 312338
MD5sum: 0869e4be0afd94fdb956e5dacb787061
SHA1: 9e30eeb5999f10e62b5e56abef30a15c5a8507c1
SHA256: eda32081df2a6e2542e4c5993ceaa4655c9d806395231a3e9b e0655e474677b1
Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data
This package contains data that represent the history of local time for
many
representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to
reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC
offsets,
and daylight-saving rules
Bugs: mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Origin: Ubuntu
Task: minimal
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHJ5vxd90bcYOAWPYRAiu6AJ9O2dDIEb+HswgO7YnDJd lQzJwBpgCglF63
> yVfc5FsG5b7vu6xyeUTkr+4=
> =3to5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
> Perfection is a goal to be striven for, not a position to be reached.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
"Jim Richardson" wrote in message
news:hoikv4-hb1.ln1@dragon.myth...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>>> savings
>>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What distro?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No answer?
>>
>> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>>
>> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
>> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one)
>> led
>> me to assume that it was clear.
>>
>> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>>
>
>
> Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
>
> apt-cache show tzdata
>
> will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
***** Thank you by the way. Really. ******
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHJ5vxd90bcYOAWPYRAiu6AJ9O2dDIEb+HswgO7YnDJd lQzJwBpgCglF63
> yVfc5FsG5b7vu6xyeUTkr+4=
> =3to5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
> Perfection is a goal to be striven for, not a position to be reached.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400, Keith Windsor wrote:
> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>> savings
>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>
>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What distro?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> No answer?
>
> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>
> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one)
> led me to assume that it was clear.
>
> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
Getting back to the OP my Blackberry jumped back 1 hour Sunday night.
I suspect, I don't know, but suspect, they are running Unix of some sorts.
--
flatfish+++
"Why do they call it a flatfish?"
"Is this the year of Linux?"
"Linux is free only when your time has no value"
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:12:48 -0400,
Keith Windsor wrote:
>
> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
> news:hoikv4-hb1.ln1@dragon.myth...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>
>>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>>> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>>>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>>>> savings
>>>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What distro?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No answer?
>>>
>>> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>>>
>>> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
>>> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one)
>>> led
>>> me to assume that it was clear.
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>>>
>>
>>
>> Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
>>
>> apt-cache show tzdata
>>
>> will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
>
>
> Package: tzdata
> Priority: required
> Section: libs
> Installed-Size: 5716
> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers
> Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
> Architecture: all
> Version: 2006m-1ubuntu1
> Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales
> Filename: pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2006m-1ubuntu1_all.deb
> Size: 312338
> MD5sum: 0869e4be0afd94fdb956e5dacb787061
> SHA1: 9e30eeb5999f10e62b5e56abef30a15c5a8507c1
> SHA256: eda32081df2a6e2542e4c5993ceaa4655c9d806395231a3e9b e0655e474677b1
> Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data
> This package contains data that represent the history of local time for
> many
> representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to
> reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC
> offsets,
> and daylight-saving rules
> Bugs: mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Origin: Ubuntu
> Task: minimal
>
>
>
>
Then no, you aren't "fully patched and up to date" since the current
version of tzdata for Edgy Eft (6.10) is 2007h-0ubuntu0.6.10, not
2006m-1ubuntu1.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHJ7dpd90bcYOAWPYRArYsAJ9N4y+FTmVr7ywNsmWQC1 uUrxCxugCfY64t
/YS/hILixoWygosqZRIbXWA=
=awKh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
A camera can record the news, a rifle, can make it.
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
After takin' a swig o' grog, ray belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400, Keith Windsor wrote:
>
>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight savings
>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>
>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>
>> (It's time for "linux is just the kernel" and some 3rd party app controls
>> the time.)
>
> Mine are all up to date and none of them did. I would suggest that your
> timezone info was not updated.
My Linux box was fine. The Win 2000 VM, of course, fell back
prematurely.
Oh, I keep both systems up-to-date, by the way.
Keith Windsock/Winsock needs to learn how to plug in a connector.
--
Tux rox!
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:18:11 +0000, Linonut wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, ray belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400, Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>> savings time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>
>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>
>>> (It's time for "linux is just the kernel" and some 3rd party app
>>> controls the time.)
>>
>> Mine are all up to date and none of them did. I would suggest that your
>> timezone info was not updated.
>
> My Linux box was fine. The Win 2000 VM, of course, fell back
> prematurely.
>
> Oh, I keep both systems up-to-date, by the way.
>
> Keith Windsock/Winsock needs to learn how to plug in a connector.
Blackberry's were not.
So what OS are they using?
--
flatfish+++
"Why do they call it a flatfish?"
"Is this the year of Linux?"
"Linux is free only when your time has no value"
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
After takin' a swig o' grog, flatfish+++ belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:18:11 +0000, Linonut wrote:
>
> Blackberry's were not.
> So what OS are they using?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry
RIM provides a proprietary multi-tasking operating system (OS) for
the BlackBerry, ...
Of course, they could get clock-synch signals from somewhere else. I do
not know.
> --
> flatfish+++
>
> "Why do they call it a flatfish?"
Uh, because that's the signature on the posts?
> "Is this the year of Linux?"
Every year is Linux year!
> "Linux is free only when your time has no value"
Pffft. I have to spend a lot of time dicking with Windows, too, and it
ain't free.
--
Tux rox!
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
"Jim Richardson" wrote in message
news:9kpkv4-qni.ln1@dragon.myth...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:12:48 -0400,
> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>> news:hoikv4-hb1.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>>>> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>>>>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>>>>> savings
>>>>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What distro?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No answer?
>>>>
>>>> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>>>>
>>>> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
>>>> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one)
>>>> led
>>>> me to assume that it was clear.
>>>>
>>>> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
>>>
>>> apt-cache show tzdata
>>>
>>> will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
>>
>>
>> Package: tzdata
>> Priority: required
>> Section: libs
>> Installed-Size: 5716
>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers
>> Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
>> Architecture: all
>> Version: 2006m-1ubuntu1
>> Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales
>> Filename: pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2006m-1ubuntu1_all.deb
>> Size: 312338
>> MD5sum: 0869e4be0afd94fdb956e5dacb787061
>> SHA1: 9e30eeb5999f10e62b5e56abef30a15c5a8507c1
>> SHA256: eda32081df2a6e2542e4c5993ceaa4655c9d806395231a3e9b e0655e474677b1
>> Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data
>> This package contains data that represent the history of local time for
>> many
>> representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to
>> reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC
>> offsets,
>> and daylight-saving rules
>> Bugs: mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Origin: Ubuntu
>> Task: minimal
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Then no, you aren't "fully patched and up to date" since the current
> version of tzdata for Edgy Eft (6.10) is 2007h-0ubuntu0.6.10, not
> 2006m-1ubuntu1.
Well it's telling me that I am up to date. Here's why I say that.
1) The little "notifier icon" in the top right corner by the date and volume
control is not on. Normally there's a little 'orange dot' there when updates
are needed.
2) I try to manually update by doing this following:
System->Administration->Update Manager. Press the "Check" button, enter
password. The "Software Updates" dialog reads, "Your system is up-to-date"
3) I Google'd and found the way to update the system from the command line.
So I run it. The output is below. Again... nothing gets updated and it
doesn't tell me that any packages are out of date.
Is the "update mechanism" broken or borked?
- Keith
keith@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update
Get: 1 http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security Release.gpg [191B]
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Translation-en_US
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Translation-en_US
Get: 2 http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy Release.gpg [191B]
Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Translation-en_US
Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Translation-en_US
Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Translation-en_US
Get: 3 http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper Release.gpg [189B]
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy Release
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security Release
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper Release
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Sources
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Packages
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Sources
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Sources
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Sources
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Packages
Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper/universe Sources
Fetched 3B in 0s (5B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
keith@ubuntu:~$
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:37:04 -0400,
Keith Windsor wrote:
>
> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
> news:9kpkv4-qni.ln1@dragon.myth...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:12:48 -0400,
>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>
>>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>>> news:hoikv4-hb1.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>>>>> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>>>>>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>>>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to daylight
>>>>>>>> savings
>>>>>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What distro?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No answer?
>>>>>
>>>>> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by downloading
>>>>> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest one)
>>>>> led
>>>>> me to assume that it was clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
>>>>
>>>> apt-cache show tzdata
>>>>
>>>> will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
>>>
>>>
>>> Package: tzdata
>>> Priority: required
>>> Section: libs
>>> Installed-Size: 5716
>>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers
>>> Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
>>> Architecture: all
>>> Version: 2006m-1ubuntu1
>>> Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales
>>> Filename: pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2006m-1ubuntu1_all.deb
>>> Size: 312338
>>> MD5sum: 0869e4be0afd94fdb956e5dacb787061
>>> SHA1: 9e30eeb5999f10e62b5e56abef30a15c5a8507c1
>>> SHA256: eda32081df2a6e2542e4c5993ceaa4655c9d806395231a3e9b e0655e474677b1
>>> Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data
>>> This package contains data that represent the history of local time for
>>> many
>>> representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to
>>> reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC
>>> offsets,
>>> and daylight-saving rules
>>> Bugs: mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Origin: Ubuntu
>>> Task: minimal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Then no, you aren't "fully patched and up to date" since the current
>> version of tzdata for Edgy Eft (6.10) is 2007h-0ubuntu0.6.10, not
>> 2006m-1ubuntu1.
>
> Well it's telling me that I am up to date. Here's why I say that.
>
> 1) The little "notifier icon" in the top right corner by the date and volume
> control is not on. Normally there's a little 'orange dot' there when updates
> are needed.
>
> 2) I try to manually update by doing this following:
> System->Administration->Update Manager. Press the "Check" button, enter
> password. The "Software Updates" dialog reads, "Your system is up-to-date"
>
> 3) I Google'd and found the way to update the system from the command line.
> So I run it. The output is below. Again... nothing gets updated and it
> doesn't tell me that any packages are out of date.
>
> Is the "update mechanism" broken or borked?
>
> - Keith
>
>
> keith@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update
> Get: 1 http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security Release.gpg [191B]
> Ign http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Translation-en_US
> Ign http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Translation-en_US
> Get: 2 http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy Release.gpg [191B]
> Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Translation-en_US
> Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Translation-en_US
> Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Translation-en_US
> Get: 3 http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper Release.gpg [189B]
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy Release
> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security Release
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper Release
> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Packages
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Packages
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Packages
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Sources
> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Packages
> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Sources
> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Sources
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Sources
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Packages
> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper/universe Sources
> Fetched 3B in 0s (5B/s)
> Reading package lists... Done
> keith@ubuntu:~$
>
You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
/etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHKNgbd90bcYOAWPYRAmdJAKDmCek5pKfAQ4Ml3vLCcU xzmYSX3QCfcU+A
nCXoapZ0e9NXYKy9oW1NNdY=
=fZo9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
The race isn't always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong,
But it's the safest way to bet.
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
"Jim Richardson" wrote in message
news:sp1nv4-qi6.ln1@dragon.myth...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:37:04 -0400,
> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>> news:9kpkv4-qni.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:12:48 -0400,
>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>>>> news:hoikv4-hb1.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:25 -0400,
>>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1vekv4-cbo.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:21 -0700,
>>>>>>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:02 -0400,
>>>>>>>> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Most of our linux boxes have WRONGLY adjusted themselves to
>>>>>>>>> daylight
>>>>>>>>> savings
>>>>>>>>> time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past weekend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And yes, these are all fully patched and up to date.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What distro?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No answer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Answer. Your original question got lost in all the noise in this
>>>>>> group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, my recent complaint about Ubuntu having to upgrade by
>>>>>> downloading
>>>>>> every single version at a time (instead of just getting the latest
>>>>>> one)
>>>>>> led
>>>>>> me to assume that it was clear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ubuntu 6.1 "Edgy Eft"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Worked fine here. What version of tzdata is installed?
>>>>>
>>>>> apt-cache show tzdata
>>>>>
>>>>> will get that, or using synaptic for the clicky pointy way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Package: tzdata
>>>> Priority: required
>>>> Section: libs
>>>> Installed-Size: 5716
>>>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers
>>>> Original-Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
>>>>
>>>> Architecture: all
>>>> Version: 2006m-1ubuntu1
>>>> Replaces: libc0.1, libc0.3, libc6, libc6.1, locales
>>>> Filename: pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2006m-1ubuntu1_all.deb
>>>> Size: 312338
>>>> MD5sum: 0869e4be0afd94fdb956e5dacb787061
>>>> SHA1: 9e30eeb5999f10e62b5e56abef30a15c5a8507c1
>>>> SHA256:
>>>> eda32081df2a6e2542e4c5993ceaa4655c9d806395231a3e9b e0655e474677b1
>>>> Description: Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data
>>>> This package contains data that represent the history of local time
>>>> for
>>>> many
>>>> representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically
>>>> to
>>>> reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC
>>>> offsets,
>>>> and daylight-saving rules
>>>> Bugs: mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Origin: Ubuntu
>>>> Task: minimal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Then no, you aren't "fully patched and up to date" since the current
>>> version of tzdata for Edgy Eft (6.10) is 2007h-0ubuntu0.6.10, not
>>> 2006m-1ubuntu1.
>>
>> Well it's telling me that I am up to date. Here's why I say that.
>>
>> 1) The little "notifier icon" in the top right corner by the date and
>> volume
>> control is not on. Normally there's a little 'orange dot' there when
>> updates
>> are needed.
>>
>> 2) I try to manually update by doing this following:
>> System->Administration->Update Manager. Press the "Check" button, enter
>> password. The "Software Updates" dialog reads, "Your system is
>> up-to-date"
>>
>> 3) I Google'd and found the way to update the system from the command
>> line.
>> So I run it. The output is below. Again... nothing gets updated and it
>> doesn't tell me that any packages are out of date.
>>
>> Is the "update mechanism" broken or borked?
>>
>> - Keith
>>
>>
>> keith@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update
>> Get: 1 http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security Release.gpg [191B]
>> Ign http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Translation-en_US
>> Ign http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Translation-en_US
>> Get: 2 http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy Release.gpg [191B]
>> Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Translation-en_US
>> Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Translation-en_US
>> Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Translation-en_US
>> Get: 3 http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper Release.gpg [189B]
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy Release
>> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security Release
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper Release
>> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Packages
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Packages
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Packages
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main Sources
>> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Packages
>> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/main Sources
>> Hit http://security.ubuntu.com edgy-security/restricted Sources
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/restricted Sources
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Packages
>> Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper/universe Sources
>> Fetched 3B in 0s (5B/s)
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> keith@ubuntu:~$
>>
>
> You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
> know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
> the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
> /etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
>
Thanks again.
That's certainly interesting. I had 'Dapper' installed previously. Then I
used the "automatic update" to upgrade me to "Edgy" a couple of days ago
which is when I complained that it didn't take me straight to the latest
version. That the automatic update only upgraded me one version at a time.
During the upgrade it downloaded around 570 Megs and the update ran without
any errors, warnings or anything. It told me I needed to reboot to complete
the upgrade which I did and all appears to be working. Until the DST issue
that is. And now it looks like a Franken-build has taken over my machine.
Maybe the best thing to do at this point is to screw the "automatic updates"
and simply download "Gutsy", burn the CD and boot+install right from the CD.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:32:42 -0400,
Keith Windsor wrote:
>
> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
> news:sp1nv4-qi6.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>
>>
>> You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
>> know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
>> the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
>> /etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
>>
>
> Thanks again.
>
> That's certainly interesting. I had 'Dapper' installed previously. Then I
> used the "automatic update" to upgrade me to "Edgy" a couple of days ago
> which is when I complained that it didn't take me straight to the latest
> version. That the automatic update only upgraded me one version at a time.
>
Did you have anything like automatix or easybuntu installed at the time?
scripts that add repositories for things like mp3, flash and java and such?
> During the upgrade it downloaded around 570 Megs and the update ran without
> any errors, warnings or anything. It told me I needed to reboot to complete
> the upgrade which I did and all appears to be working. Until the DST issue
> that is. And now it looks like a Franken-build has taken over my machine.
>
Dunno what the core error is, I would expect the dapper lines to mostly
be ignored as they have stuff that's lower in version than the Edgy
stuff, but I don't know for sure.
> Maybe the best thing to do at this point is to screw the "automatic updates"
> and simply download "Gutsy", burn the CD and boot+install right from the CD.
>
>
Certainly an option. I did an upgrade from Dapper -> edgy on my laptop,
later, went to feisty and then did a clean install to Gutsy when it came
out (I had done an upgrade to Gutsy when it was still in pre-release,
and it broke a couple of minor things, so I decided to reinstall when
Gutsy was released ) My desktop has been upgraded since Dapper, with no
problems like you experienced.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHKPy5d90bcYOAWPYRAkXOAKDQVecbQ5n0RANmVzVU1S IjkVUvGACfS6N6
3gKbNrFICs45kG8i0q+UTMU=
=Ay68
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer.
-- Henry Lawson
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
Jim Richardson wrote:
> You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
> know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
> the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
> /etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
Good goat.. The OP yells & balls about the OS " WRONGLY adjusted themselves
to daylight savings time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past
weekend." i.e. blames the OS. Turns out that they have a mix of Dapper &
Edgy on the machines....that's an *admin* screwup, not the OS. Typical
wintroll, blame Linux when you know f8ck all about it.
--
Operating systems: FreeBSD 6.2, PC-BSD 1.4,
Testing: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1.5
Linux systems: Debian 4.0, PCLinuxOS 2007,
Kubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy"
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
"Jim Richardson" wrote in message
news
uanv4-g8q.ln1@dragon.myth...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:32:42 -0400,
> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>> news:sp1nv4-qi6.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>
>>>
>>> You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
>>> know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
>>> the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
>>> /etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> That's certainly interesting. I had 'Dapper' installed previously. Then I
>> used the "automatic update" to upgrade me to "Edgy" a couple of days ago
>> which is when I complained that it didn't take me straight to the latest
>> version. That the automatic update only upgraded me one version at a
>> time.
>>
>
> Did you have anything like automatix or easybuntu installed at the time?
> scripts that add repositories for things like mp3, flash and java and
> such?
Not that I'm aware of. I ran 'dpkg --get-selections' and looked for
automatix and easybuntu but they didn't appear in the list. I'm assuming
that if they were installed then 'dpkg --get-selections' would have listed
them.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread. On this machine I installed a fresh
copy of "Dapper Drake 6.06 LTS" from bare metal on this machine. I then used
the automatic update to upgrade the machine to "6.10 Edgy Eft" I realize
this isn't the absolute latest version but it's the version that it upgraded
me to. But it appears that the upgrade wasn't quite right.
>> During the upgrade it downloaded around 570 Megs and the update ran
>> without
>> any errors, warnings or anything. It told me I needed to reboot to
>> complete
>> the upgrade which I did and all appears to be working. Until the DST
>> issue
>> that is. And now it looks like a Franken-build has taken over my machine.
>>
>
> Dunno what the core error is, I would expect the dapper lines to mostly
> be ignored as they have stuff that's lower in version than the Edgy
> stuff, but I don't know for sure.
This is all new to me. Manually setting the time isn't a big deal (it'll be
right this weekend anyway). But who knows what else isn't working right.
>> Maybe the best thing to do at this point is to screw the "automatic
>> updates"
>> and simply download "Gutsy", burn the CD and boot+install right from the
>> CD.
>>
>>
>
>
> Certainly an option. I did an upgrade from Dapper -> edgy on my laptop,
> later, went to feisty and then did a clean install to Gutsy when it came
> out (I had done an upgrade to Gutsy when it was still in pre-release,
> and it broke a couple of minor things, so I decided to reinstall when
> Gutsy was released ) My desktop has been upgraded since Dapper, with no
> problems like you experienced.
This sounds like the best alternative. I'll download and burn the CD later
today when I get some time.
Thank you again.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
"William Poaster" wrote in message
news:7vfnv4-pn5.ln1@pcbsd.archimedes.eu...
> Jim Richardson wrote:
>
>
>
>> You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
>> know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
>> the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
>> /etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
>
> Good goat.. The OP yells & balls about the OS " WRONGLY adjusted
> themselves
> to daylight savings time which starts NEXT WEEKEND... not this past
> weekend." i.e. blames the OS. Turns out that they have a mix of Dapper &
> Edgy on the machines....that's an *admin* screwup, not the OS. Typical
> wintroll, blame Linux when you know f8ck all about it.
No fool. It's not an *admin* screwup. The automatic upgrade from 6.06 to 6.1
is what screwed up. Anyone with half a brain who followed this thread should
be able to figure this out since not once did I mention an "Admin" anywhere
at any time. The mix of Dapper and Edgy is the result of letting Ubuntu
upgrade the system.
Then again, what can you expect from the same fool that thinks that
connecting to a NTP time server will somehow correct time-zone information.
You are beyond a worthless fool.
> --
> Operating systems: FreeBSD 6.2, PC-BSD 1.4,
> Testing: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1.5
> Linux systems: Debian 4.0, PCLinuxOS 2007,
> Kubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy"
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
-
Re: Why did linux change to DST too early in the USA?
Jim Richardson espoused:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:32:42 -0400,
> Keith Windsor wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Richardson" wrote in message
>> news:sp1nv4-qi6.ln1@dragon.myth...
>>>
>>>
>>> You've got a mix of dapper and edgy in there, that's not good. Don't
>>> know if that's the core of the problem or not, since Dapper is also on
>>> the later version of the tzdata, but I'd remove all the lines in
>>> /etc/apt/sources.list that refer to dapper.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> That's certainly interesting. I had 'Dapper' installed previously. Then I
>> used the "automatic update" to upgrade me to "Edgy" a couple of days ago
>> which is when I complained that it didn't take me straight to the latest
>> version. That the automatic update only upgraded me one version at a time.
>>
>
> Did you have anything like automatix or easybuntu installed at the time?
> scripts that add repositories for things like mp3, flash and java and such?
>
>
>> During the upgrade it downloaded around 570 Megs and the update ran without
>> any errors, warnings or anything. It told me I needed to reboot to complete
>> the upgrade which I did and all appears to be working. Until the DST issue
>> that is. And now it looks like a Franken-build has taken over my machine.
>>
>
> Dunno what the core error is, I would expect the dapper lines to mostly
> be ignored as they have stuff that's lower in version than the Edgy
> stuff, but I don't know for sure.
>
>> Maybe the best thing to do at this point is to screw the "automatic updates"
>> and simply download "Gutsy", burn the CD and boot+install right from the CD.
>>
>>
>
>
> Certainly an option. I did an upgrade from Dapper -> edgy on my laptop,
> later, went to feisty and then did a clean install to Gutsy when it came
> out (I had done an upgrade to Gutsy when it was still in pre-release,
> and it broke a couple of minor things, so I decided to reinstall when
> Gutsy was released ) My desktop has been upgraded since Dapper, with no
> problems like you experienced.
>
>
Ah, well, we get to the bottom of the problems of another troll... The
great thing about linux, though, is that you can always fix these
things, even with they're "administator induced" problems.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |