Re: Google rises over $600 - Linux
This is a discussion on Re: Google rises over $600 - Linux ; On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:06:45 +0100, BearItAll wrote:
> nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu wrote:
>
>> I saw the headlines yesterday in the San Jose Mercury. Google runs on
>> an estimated million Linux servers. Must be some of that "Linux
>> ...
-
Re: Google rises over $600
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:06:45 +0100, BearItAll wrote:
> nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu wrote:
>
>> I saw the headlines yesterday in the San Jose Mercury. Google runs on
>> an estimated million Linux servers. Must be some of that "Linux
>> crapware" DFS is always talking about.
That's because it takes a million servers for Linux to do the job that
Windows could with 10.
-
Re: Google rises over $600
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:06:45 +0100, BearItAll wrote:
>
>> nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu wrote:
>>
>>> I saw the headlines yesterday in the San Jose Mercury. Google runs on
>>> an estimated million Linux servers. Must be some of that "Linux
>>> crapware" DFS is always talking about.
>
>
>
> That's because it takes a million servers for Linux to do the job that
> Windows could with 10.
>
>
Yes. Something along the lines of Hotmail
--
You're genuinely bogus.
-
Re: Google rises over $600
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>> It has been proven that Microsoft have illegally used their monopoly
>> to prevent competition.
>
>No, it hasn't. You seem to be deliberately misrepresenting the facts.
>There is a difference between acting uncompetitively and successfully
>preventing competition. There is no evidence,
Yes, there is, Ewik. Lie much?
>nor has it been proven that
>anything Microsoft has done has actually prevented competition,
Well, they weren't able to "prove" that OJ is a murderer, either.
>even if their actions have been found to be anti-competitive.
LOL You are truly scum, as is anyone who defends the immoral M$
Corp.