What do you think about Microsoft's 2003 server? - Linux
This is a discussion on What do you think about Microsoft's 2003 server? - Linux ; I know it may seem a little odd to ask a question like this in a Linux
newsgroup, but I think the input here is very good. I have heard that
Microsoft's Server 2003 corrects a lot of the issues ...
-
What do you think about Microsoft's 2003 server?
I know it may seem a little odd to ask a question like this in a Linux
newsgroup, but I think the input here is very good. I have heard that
Microsoft's Server 2003 corrects a lot of the issues with stability and
security? Is this true? Do you think Microsoft is finally selling a stable
and secure OS? Or is Linux still the far superior server OS?
-
Re: What do you think about Microsoft's 2003 server?
Aaron Lewis wrote:
> I know it may seem a little odd to ask a question like this in a Linux
> newsgroup, but I think the input here is very good. I have heard that
> Microsoft's Server 2003 corrects a lot of the issues with stability and
> security? Is this true? Do you think Microsoft is finally selling a stable
> and secure OS?
I don't know and I don't care.
> Or is Linux still the far superior server OS?
It doesn't matter to me whether MSWindows is "superior" to Linux or Linux is
"superior" to MSWindows. I use Linux for what it can do for me, not for it's
position within a hypothetical competition between it and MSWindows.
--
Lew Pitcher
Master Codewright and JOAT-in-training
Registered Linux User #112576 (http://counter.li.org/)
Slackware - Because I know what I'm doing.
