Hi,

Thanks everyone.
I confirm that the patch fixes the issue with Rlimit and invalid address.

Signed-off-by: halesh.sadashiv@ap.sony.com

Thanks,
Halesh



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "KOSAKI Motohiro"
> To: "Andrew Morton"
> Subject: Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17
> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:23:40 +0900
>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > I assume that you tested it too?

>
> Yes, my x86_64 box works well.
>
> sorry, ambiguity e-mail.
>
> halesh's test check two point.
> - mlock rlimit
> - invlid address range
>
> and, I think rlimit already works well.
> So, I ask halesh re-confirming.
>
> > If it comes down to a choice between complying with SuS versus
> > complying with earlier Linux versions then we'd usually prefer to
> > comply with earlier Linux versions.

>
> I see.
>
> > I queued this, but would prefer to await confirmation that it has been
> > tested to take us back to the 2.6.18 interface, please.

>
> Yes.
> this patch wasn't tested on split-lru yet.
> I'll do that. (and probably fix it)
>
> > Also, please send a Signed-off-by: for this change.

>
> Agghh, sorry. it is stupid forgotten.


>



=


--
_______________________________________________
Search for products and services at:
http://search.mail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/