Signed-off-by: Robert Richter
---
drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
index 69a7327..615929f 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
@@ -268,6 +268,17 @@ lookup_dcookie(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, off_t *offset)
return cookie;
}

+static void increment_tail(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
+{
+ unsigned long new_tail = b->tail_pos + 1;
+
+ rmb();
+
+ if (new_tail < b->buffer_size)
+ b->tail_pos = new_tail;
+ else
+ b->tail_pos = 0;
+}

static unsigned long last_cookie = INVALID_COOKIE;

@@ -417,19 +428,6 @@ static unsigned long get_slots(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
}


-static void increment_tail(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
-{
- unsigned long new_tail = b->tail_pos + 1;
-
- rmb();
-
- if (new_tail < b->buffer_size)
- b->tail_pos = new_tail;
- else
- b->tail_pos = 0;
-}
-
-
/* Move tasks along towards death. Any tasks on dead_tasks
* will definitely have no remaining references in any
* CPU buffers at this point, because we use two lists,
--
1.5.5.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/