linux-next: Tree for June 24 - Kernel

This is a discussion on linux-next: Tree for June 24 - Kernel ; On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there, > but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: linux-next: Tree for June 24

  1. Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)

    On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    >
    > The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there,
    > but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?)
    >
    > Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to
    > Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git
    > tree needs to be regenerated.


    Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree
    now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look
    fixed up.
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  2. Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)

    Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    >> The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there,
    >> but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?)
    >>
    >> Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to
    >> Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git
    >> tree needs to be regenerated.

    >
    > Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree
    > now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look
    > fixed up.


    Yep, I believe Lachlan is planning to regenerate the xfs git tree before
    the pull request.

    --Tim
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  3. Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)

    On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:10 +1000 Timothy Shimmin wrote:
    >
    > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > >> The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there,
    > >> but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?)
    > >>
    > >> Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to
    > >> Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git
    > >> tree needs to be regenerated.

    > >
    > > Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree
    > > now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look
    > > fixed up.

    >
    > Yep, I believe Lachlan is planning to regenerate the xfs git tree before
    > the pull request.


    When that happens, could you please make sure that the linux-next tree is
    updated as well ... I have had a couple of trees where what was merged to
    Linus did not match what is in linux-next - and that causes me no end of
    pain when I have to merge the two ...

    --
    Cheers,
    Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
    http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

    iEYEARECAAYFAkh/ArMACgkQjjKRsyhoI8xRWQCfcz+yY6tObbYzrknUZ2UapMzT
    DBgAn1rYAsAyCL2H5xRIrIXR/bHyVkNG
    =s9sP
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2