[-mm] Disable the memory controller by default - Kernel
This is a discussion on [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default - Kernel ; Due to the overhead of the memory controller. The
memory controller is now disabled by default. This patch changes
cgroup_disable to cgroup_toggle, so that each controller can decide
whether it wants to be enabled/disabled by default.
If everyone agrees on ...
-
[-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
Due to the overhead of the memory controller. The
memory controller is now disabled by default. This patch changes
cgroup_disable to cgroup_toggle, so that each controller can decide
whether it wants to be enabled/disabled by default.
If everyone agrees on this approach and likes it, should we push this
into 2.6.25?
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh
---
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++--
kernel/cgroup.c | 11 ++++++-----
mm/memcontrol.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/cgroup.c~memory-controller-default-option-off kernel/cgroup.c
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8/kernel/cgroup.c~memory-controller-default-option-off 2008-04-07 16:24:28.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-balbir/kernel/cgroup.c 2008-04-07 16:47:48.000000000 +0530
@@ -3063,7 +3063,7 @@ static void cgroup_release_agent(struct
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
}
-static int __init cgroup_disable(char *str)
+static int __init cgroup_toggle(char *str)
{
int i;
char *token;
@@ -3076,13 +3076,14 @@ static int __init cgroup_disable(char *s
struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i];
if (!strcmp(token, ss->name)) {
- ss->disabled = 1;
- printk(KERN_INFO "Disabling %s control group"
- " subsystem\n", ss->name);
+ ss->disabled = !ss->disabled;
+ if (ss->disabled)
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s control group "
+ "is disabled", ss->name);
break;
}
}
}
return 1;
}
-__setup("cgroup_disable=", cgroup_disable);
+__setup("cgroup_toggle=", cgroup_toggle);
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-default-option-off mm/memcontrol.c
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8/mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-default-option-off 2008-04-07 16:24:28.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c 2008-04-07 16:40:22.000000000 +0530
@@ -1104,4 +1104,5 @@ struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys =
.populate = mem_cgroup_populate,
.attach = mem_cgroup_move_task,
.early_init = 0,
+ .disabled = 1,
};
diff -puN Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~memory-controller-default-option-off Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~memory-controller-default-option-off 2008-04-07 16:38:25.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-balbir/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2008-04-07 17:20:08.000000000 +0530
@@ -381,9 +381,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters.
ccw_timeout_log [S390]
See Documentation/s390/CommonIO for details.
- cgroup_disable= [KNL] Disable a particular controller
- Format: {name of the controller(s) to disable}
+ cgroup_toggle= [KNL] Toggle (enable/disable) a particular controller
+ Format: {name of the controller(s) to enable/disable}
{Currently supported controllers - "memory"}
+ {The memory controller is disabled by default}
checkreqprot [SELINUX] Set initial checkreqprot flag value.
Format: { "0" | "1" }
_
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 05:21:37PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> Due to the overhead of the memory controller. The
>> memory controller is now disabled by default. This patch changes
>> cgroup_disable to cgroup_toggle, so that each controller can decide
>> whether it wants to be enabled/disabled by default.
>>
>> If everyone agrees on this approach and likes it, should we push this
>> into 2.6.25?
>
> First I like the change to make it disabled by default.
>
> I don't think "toggle" is good semantics for a user visible switch
> because that changes the meaning when the kernel default changes
> (which it will likely once the current default overhead is fixed)
>
> It should be rather: cgroup=on/off
>
The boot control options apply to all controllers and we want to allow
controllers to decide whether they should be turned on or off. With sufficient
documentation support in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, don't you think we
can expect this to work as the user intended?
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> The boot control options apply to all controllers and we want to allow
>> controllers to decide whether they should be turned on or off. With sufficient
>> documentation support in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, don't you think we
>> can expect this to work as the user intended?
>
> 2 parameter is wrong?
>
> cgroup_disable= [KNL] Disable a particular controller
> Format: {name of the controller(s) to disable}
> cgroup_enable= [KNL] Enable a particular controller
> Format: {name of the controller(s) to enable}
>
No, it is not all bad. That can be done, but we need to guard against a usage like
cgroup_disable=memory cgroup_enable=memory
The user will probably get what he/she deserves for it.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
> The boot control options apply to all controllers and we want to allow
> controllers to decide whether they should be turned on or off.
Ok that's fine too (to have finer grained options), just those should
be on/off too, not toggle.
> documentation support in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, don't you think we
> can expect this to work as the user intended?
Even with documentation support semantics changes over releases are not nice.
So "toggle" is bad, always have it absolute values.
So if an user decides they want full cgroup support and stick in a option
for .25 into their boot loader config they should always get full cgroup support in
all future kernels. Similiar if someone decides they don't need it.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
> The boot control options apply to all controllers and we want to allow
> controllers to decide whether they should be turned on or off. With sufficient
> documentation support in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, don't you think we
> can expect this to work as the user intended?
2 parameter is wrong?
cgroup_disable= [KNL] Disable a particular controller
Format: {name of the controller(s) to disable}
cgroup_enable= [KNL] Enable a particular controller
Format: {name of the controller(s) to enable}
e.g.
user specified cgroup_enable=mem.
if default value is disable, it mean turn to enable.
if default value is enable, it is meaningless param.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
Hi
> diff -puN Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~memory-controller-default-option-off Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc8/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~memory-controller-default-option-off 2008-04-07 16:38:25.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-balbir/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2008-04-07 17:20:08.000000000 +0530
> @@ -381,9 +381,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters.
> ccw_timeout_log [S390]
> See Documentation/s390/CommonIO for details.
>
> - cgroup_disable= [KNL] Disable a particular controller
> - Format: {name of the controller(s) to disable}
> + cgroup_toggle= [KNL] Toggle (enable/disable) a particular controller
> + Format: {name of the controller(s) to enable/disable}
> {Currently supported controllers - "memory"}
> + {The memory controller is disabled by default}
>
> checkreqprot [SELINUX] Set initial checkreqprot flag value.
> Format: { "0" | "1" }
Hmm..
toggle parameter seems no good idea.
because if change default value in the future, boot parmeter becomes
an opposite meaning.
thus, we can't change default value even if we will be able to get
enough performance improvement in the future.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> No, it is not all bad. That can be done, but we need to guard against a usage like
>
> cgroup_disable=memory cgroup_enable=memory
>
> The user will probably get what he/she deserves for it.
I don't think we need to guard against that. It seems perfectly valid
to have a lilo config with
append="cgroup_disable=memory"
and then want to boot with the memory controller enabled you can do
lilo -R cgroup_enable=memory
The kernel command line will then look like
"... cgroup_disable=memory cgroup_enable=memory"
and the last switch should win.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/