From: Harvey Harrison

In two case statements, use the ever popular 'i' instead of index:
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1063:7: warning: symbol 'index' shadows an earlier one
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1000:9: originally declared here
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1079:7: warning: symbol 'index' shadows an earlier one
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1000:9: originally declared here

Make it static.
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1945:24: warning: symbol 'emulate_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?

Drop the return statements.
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2878:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2944:2: warning: returning void-valued expression

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 15bba5d..cf6261e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1083,32 +1083,32 @@ static void do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
}
/* function 4 and 0xb have additional index. */
case 4: {
- int index, cache_type;
+ int i, cache_type;

entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
/* read more entries until cache_type is zero */
- for (index = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++index) {
- cache_type = entry[index - 1].eax & 0x1f;
+ for (i = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++i) {
+ cache_type = entry[i - 1].eax & 0x1f;
if (!cache_type)
break;
- do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[index], function, index);
- entry[index].flags |=
+ do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[i], function, i);
+ entry[i].flags |=
KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
++*nent;
}
break;
}
case 0xb: {
- int index, level_type;
+ int i, level_type;

entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
/* read more entries until level_type is zero */
- for (index = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++index) {
- level_type = entry[index - 1].ecx & 0xff;
+ for (i = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++i) {
+ level_type = entry[i - 1].ecx & 0xff;
if (!level_type)
break;
- do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[index], function, index);
- entry[index].flags |=
+ do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[i], function, i);
+ entry[i].flags |=
KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
++*nent;
}
@@ -1965,7 +1965,7 @@ void kvm_report_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *context)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_report_emulation_failure);

-struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = {
+static struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = {
.read_std = emulator_read_std,
.read_emulated = emulator_read_emulated,
.write_emulated = emulator_write_emulated,
@@ -2899,7 +2899,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
static void get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_segment *var, int seg)
{
- return kvm_x86_ops->get_segment(vcpu, var, seg);
+ kvm_x86_ops->get_segment(vcpu, var, seg);
}

void kvm_get_cs_db_l_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *db, int *l)
@@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static void set_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_segment *var, int seg)
{
- return kvm_x86_ops->set_segment(vcpu, var, seg);
+ kvm_x86_ops->set_segment(vcpu, var, seg);
}

int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
--
1.5.4.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/