On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > There is still the additional seek.

> You've been proposing and implementing a solution which needs an
> additional seek. Don't use double standards.

You're wrong. I am implementing a solution that allows two
methods -- one (SHDR) that needs an seek (but an continuous one
so it's likely served from the track buffer) but has some advantages
and another one (PHDR) that does not require a seek.

You two are arguing a method that always requires the seek
and has a couple of other drawbacks as earlier discussed too.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/