=?WINDOWS-1252?Q?manual_page_'ack_to_Inbox_Arch?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?iveReport_SpamDelete_More_Acti?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ons_1_of_584_Older_=9B_manual_pa?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ge_'man_2_fork'_wrt_file_locks?= - Kernel
This is a discussion on =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?manual_page_'ack_to_Inbox_Arch?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?iveReport_SpamDelete_More_Acti?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ons_1_of_584_Older_=9B_manual_pa?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ge_'man_2_fork'_wrt_file_locks?= - Kernel ; Manual page 'man 2 fork' says: 'File locks ... are not inherited.' This is true for POSIX locks (fcntl-style locks). But flock-style locks (aka bsd-style locks) are not inherited across fork, correct ? Would not it be more helpful if ...
 |
| | LinkBack | Tools |
|
#1
11-19-2007, 02:20 PM
| |||
| |||
 =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?manual_page_'ack_to_Inbox_Arch?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?iveReport_SpamDelete_More_Acti?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ons_1_of_584_Older_=9B_manual_pa?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ge_'man_2_fork'_wrt_file_locks?= 'File locks ... are not inherited.' This is true for POSIX locks (fcntl-style locks). But flock-style locks (aka bsd-style locks) are not inherited across fork, correct ? Would not it be more helpful if fork manpage said: POSIX file locks(fcntl(2)) are not inherited. flock-style locks are inherited (see flock(2)) ? Yakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/  |
|
#2
11-19-2007, 02:30 PM
| |||
| |||
| =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Re:_manual_page_'ack_to_Inbox_A?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?rchiveReport_SpamDelete_More_Ac?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?tions_1_of_584_Older_=9B_manual_p?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?age_'man_2_fork'_wrt_file_locks?= Sorry for the screwed subject line. Should have been: Subject: manual page 'man 2 fork' wrt file locks Yakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The return of the king - =?windows-1252?Q?=93MA95_=96_A_RE?==?windows-1252?Q?XX_interface_to_WebSphere_MQ=94?= | unix | Websphere | 0 | 12-17-2008 08:21 PM |
| The return of the king - =?windows-1252?Q?=93MA95_=96_A_RE?==?windows-1252?Q?XX_interface_to_WebSphere_MQ=94?= | unix | Websphere | 0 | 12-17-2008 08:21 PM |
| =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?2.6.24-rc3-mm1_--_arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:591:_error:_?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=91TLB=5FFLUSH=5FALL=92_undeclared_?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?(first_use_in_this_function)?= | unix | Kernel | 2 | 11-27-2007 05:10 PM |
| =?Windows-1252?Q?ANALYSE_E-MAILS=A0:_ALERTE_DE_VIRUS_DANS_LA_PI=C8CE_JOIN?= =?Windows-1252?Q?TE_!~RE:_YOUR_ARCHIVE?= | unix | Debian | 0 | 10-06-2007 05:10 PM |
| Total M$ Patch Fatigue; lightweight =?windows-1252?Q?=93LIVE=94_?==?windows-1252?Q?CD_alternative=3F?= | unix | Portable | 12 | 09-30-2007 05:28 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 AM.