* Jonathan Barber (j.barber@dundee.ac.uk) wrote:
> We don't have any particular preference WRT ssh clients, putty was just
> choosen as our test as it's what we have used in the past.


This thread got me curious, and it appears that ~2 months ago, GSSAPI
support was committed to the PuTTY subversion tree. Anyone tried it?
I'd love to move off of all of these hacked/patched versions of PuTTY
that are floating around. We're currently using
http://sweb.cz/v_t_m/#putty but in the past we've used a variety of
things. :/

Thanks!

Stephen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkK/V8ACgkQrzgMPqB3kijwUwCfWmS+Xvq8QBOfFEiaEsca2/6V
9UsAoIaaM15kuZ+J8qfQtHEC7WvtTtXr
=w+cS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----