On Monday, 20. February 2006 10:56, Guillaume Laurent wrote:

> I still fail to see how all these bad things won't happen with the
> solution you suggest. In all cases, the program has to maintain two
> separate flows of execution, and that's a hard thing to do correctly.

Very simple. if you screw up, the qtimer::singleshot you sent yourself for
waking up your work job will simply not happen (because the destination
object has been deleted already, so the qtimer is cancelled automatically).
In the other case, your application crashes.


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<