Re: kdesdk 3.5 and kdevelop 3.3
Giovanni Venturi wrote:[color=blue]
> Alle 01:43, venerd=EC 16 dicembre 2005, Matt Rogers ha scritto:[/color]
> Really? Well that say to Amilcar do Carmo Lucas that he is wrong when he =[/color]
> wrote: =[/color]
> "At the risk of sounding stupid here but .....
> We EXPLICITLY ask for BDB 4.1."[/color]
OK, I'll say it. He's wrong. I've built kdevelop/kdesdk successfully =
with db-4.0 (rh9), db-4.1 (rhel3), db-4.2 (rhel4), db-4.3 (fc4)
> as comment #1 of [url]http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D118135[/url] .
> Read all emails of this thread before you reply and don't stop to the fir=[/color]
> one. If really kdevelop compile with BDB 4.2 than wrote to Amilcar and sa=[/color]
y it =
> him. A friend of mine that uses Slackware like me confirmed that KDevelop=[/color]
> wants BDB 4.1 and kdesdk 3.5 wants BDB 4.2 . =[/color]
Like I said, AFAIK, both Amilcar and the "friend of yours that uses =
Slackware) is wrong, because it WORKSFORME.
>> Visit [url]http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub[/url] to unsubscrib=[/color][/color]