Am Montag, 5. Dezember 2005 12:23 schrieb Michael Buesch:
> On Monday 05 December 2005 08:38, David Johnson wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 December 2005 11:16 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > > Oh please, handling exceptions isn't that hard, and is much less
> > > cumbersome than checking a return code (which has not at all the same
> > > use, actually).

> >
> > Here's a link on the pitfalls of exceptions. I didn't write it, so
> > apparently I'm not the only idiot in the world.
> >
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=cache...ull.demon.co.u
> >k/c%2B%2B/dragons/+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

>
> Although my opinion might not count much here, I think the
> exceptions are one of the big _misfeatures_ of the C++ language.
> They bloat code. Nothing else. Everything done with exceptions,
> can be done with normal return codes.

Everything done with C++ can be done with C or even assembler. Everything done
with "while" can be done with GOTO. Everything done with functions, can be
done with GOSUB. But I still like, that languages have evolved.

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<