Greetings Craig,
i think there is something wrong about the code:

....
s_self =3D new RealFactory();
....

in C++, operator() is invoked and the resulting functor is then passed to =

operator new for initialization. Is that desirable?

--- wrote:
>I'm working on a KPart and I've got essentially the following:
>
>class PublicFactory : public KParts::Factory {
> public :
> KParts::Part *createPartObject( QWidget *parentWidget, const char =

>*widgetName, QObject *parent, const char *name, const char *classname, =

>const =

>QStringList &args ) {
> return RealFactory::self()->createPartObject( parentWidget, =

>widgetName, =

>parent, name, classname, args );
> }
>};
>
>/* both are static members of RealFactory */
>RealFactory *RealFactory::s_self =3D 0;
>RealFactory *RealFactory::self()
>{
> if ( !s_self ) {
> s_self =3D new RealFactory();
> }
>
> return s_self;
>}
>
>But when PublicFactory::createPartObject() gets executed, ::self =

>returns a =

>non-NULL pointer, but the _vptr of ::s_self is NULL! This causes a =

>segfault. =

>s_self is not be deleted anywhere else, this was the first thing that I =

>looked for.
>
>Under what circumstances would _vptr be NULL?
>
>Thanks.
>-- =

>
>Craig Howard
>craig@choward.ca
>Bachelor of Math - Computer Science 2005
>University of Waterloo
> =

>>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to =

>unsubscribe <<
=

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscrib=
e <<