Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)? - HP UX
This is a discussion on Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)? - HP UX ; Trying to install the DataProtector client (disk agent) on a Novell/SUSE Linux
Enterprise Server9 (SLES9) SP2 client gave the error message:
Unsupported architecture/OS type
(Linux xyzz 2.6.5-7.201-smp #1 SMP Thu Aug 25 06:20:45 UTC 2005 x64_64 x86_64
x86_64)
Can I ...
-
Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)?
Trying to install the DataProtector client (disk agent) on a Novell/SUSE Linux
Enterprise Server9 (SLES9) SP2 client gave the error message:
Unsupported architecture/OS type
(Linux xyzz 2.6.5-7.201-smp #1 SMP Thu Aug 25 06:20:45 UTC 2005 x64_64 x86_64
x86_64)
Can I convince DP to install the 32bit client (if no 64 bit client exists)?
Regards,
Ulrich
-
Re: Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)?
Ulrich Windl writes:
> Can I convince DP to install the 32bit client (if no 64 bit client exists)?
On redhat/x86_64, there is a little setarch utility which may help:
SYNOPSIS
setarch [ -3 ] program
DESCRIPTION
setarch This utility currently only affects the output of uname -m. For
example, on an AMD64 system, running 'setarch i386 program' will cause
'program' to see i686 (or other relevant arch) instead of x86_64 as
machine type. On systems where it is supported, the -3 option specifies
that processes should use a maximum of 3GB of address space.
EXAMPLES
setarch ppc32 rpmbuild --target=ppc --rebuild foo.src.rpm
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
-
Re: Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)?
Thanks Paul for the hint, but unfortunately SLES9 does not have that feature.
Regards,
Ulrich
Paul Pluzhnikov writes:
> Ulrich Windl writes:
>
> > Can I convince DP to install the 32bit client (if no 64 bit client exists)?
>
> On redhat/x86_64, there is a little setarch utility which may help:
>
> SYNOPSIS
> setarch [ -3 ] program
>
> DESCRIPTION
> setarch This utility currently only affects the output of uname -m. For
> example, on an AMD64 system, running 'setarch i386 program' will cause
> 'program' to see i686 (or other relevant arch) instead of x86_64 as
> machine type. On systems where it is supported, the -3 option specifies
> that processes should use a maximum of 3GB of address space.
>
> EXAMPLES
> setarch ppc32 rpmbuild --target=ppc --rebuild foo.src.rpm
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
> Remove /-nsp/ for email.
-
Re: Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)?
Ulrich Windl writes:
Please do not top-post:
http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Thanks Paul for the hint, but unfortunately SLES9 does not have that feature.
You should be able to compile it from source:
ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub...-1.8-1.src.rpm
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
-
Re: Data Protector v5.5 for Linux on x86_64 (Intel Xeon)?
Paul Pluzhnikov writes:
> Ulrich Windl writes:
>
> Please do not top-post:
> http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
>
> > Thanks Paul for the hint, but unfortunately SLES9 does not have that feature.
>
> You should be able to compile it from source:
> ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub...-1.8-1.src.rpm
Hi!
I chose a different solution: Patch PHSS_32842 did not help (although the
support matrix dated 10.10.2005 said it's required). So I just copied the
installation from a 32bit SUSE Linux machine and _imported_ the client
(instead of installing). So far Data Protector is happy with that. Soon I'll
now whether the scheduled backup will work. Stay tuned ;-)
Regards,
Ulrich
>
> Cheers,
> --
> In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
> Remove /-nsp/ for email.