OT: Really true? - Hewlett Packard

This is a discussion on OT: Really true? - Hewlett Packard ; McCain and the N Y Times McCain sent an op-ed piece to the New York Times. Obama had one last week, so it was hardly surprising. The Times rejected McCain's editorial demanding that "the article would have to articulate, in ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: OT: Really true?

  1. OT: Really true?

    McCain and the N Y Times

    McCain sent an op-ed piece to the New York Times. Obama had one last
    week, so it was hardly surprising. The Times rejected McCain's editorial
    demanding that

    "the article would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain
    defines victory in Iraq. It would also have to lay out a clear plan for achieving
    victory -- with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling theIraqis
    to cooperate.
    "And it would need to describe the senator’s Afghanistan strategy, spelling out
    how it meshes with his Iraq plan."

    Astonishing. All this before the mighty New York Time will accept an op-ed
    piece by the nominee of the Republican Party. Which tells us pretty well all we
    need to know about where the Times stands on the election. Read again what
    the editors demanded. Think on it.

    * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
    * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *


  2. Re: OT: Really true?

    I don't understand your problem with the NYT; they were very gracious in not
    asking McCain also give them his left leg and right arm before they would
    print his op-ed.

    You make it sound like you just discovered the NYT was, shall we say, a
    little biased. At this point, they so believe in the inevitability of Lord
    Obama, they don't even care about putting up some type of façade of
    impartiality.

    Denys

    -----Original Message-----
    From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU] On Behalf
    Of Brice Yokem
    Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 2:33 PM
    To: HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
    Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Really true?

    McCain and the N Y Times

    McCain sent an op-ed piece to the New York Times. Obama had one last
    week, so it was hardly surprising. The Times rejected McCain's editorial
    demanding that

    "the article would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain

    defines victory in Iraq. It would also have to lay out a clear plan for
    achieving
    victory -- with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling the
    Iraqis
    to cooperate.
    "And it would need to describe the senator’s Afghanistan strategy, spelling
    out
    how it meshes with his Iraq plan."

    Astonishing. All this before the mighty New York Time will accept an op-ed
    piece by the nominee of the Republican Party. Which tells us pretty well all
    we
    need to know about where the Times stands on the election. Read again what
    the editors demanded. Think on it.

    * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
    * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
    Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.5/1568 - Release Date: 7/23/2008
    6:55 AM

    * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
    * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *


+ Reply to Thread