mjt wrote:

> John wrote:
>
>
>>more than 32MB), you're probably okay.
>>
>>John
>
>
> ... why are you reply-posting to a thread that occurred
> and ended on oct 3???
> .

Why not? It didn't look like he got a definitive answer to his problem.
Thought I'd throw in my 2 cents. Besides, it all ends up getting
indexed by Google Groups for others to search and benefit from.

John