LM_sensors & IBM Thinkpads - Help

This is a discussion on LM_sensors & IBM Thinkpads - Help ; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Quick question? Are the developers of LM_sensors (gDesklets) still recommending against using LM_sensors with IBM Thinkpads. The documentation that I found on the subject is dated... 2003 was the latest I could ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: LM_sensors & IBM Thinkpads

  1. LM_sensors & IBM Thinkpads

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Hi All,

    Quick question? Are the developers of LM_sensors (gDesklets) still
    recommending against using LM_sensors with IBM Thinkpads. The
    documentation that I found on the subject is dated... 2003 was the
    latest I could find on the subject.

    So I was wondering if it is ok to use LM_sensors with a later model
    Thinkpad (R51)? Thanks in advance for your help.

    Best,
    - --
    Hakim Singhji
    New York University

    You love peace.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQFDZS/qqBvKIGSPFPsRAtx3AJ0RWX7DYKN43Lg9B2x2e+YjyRuOJgCfe XiA
    WYoDiFghQ5ykCuZiXbe7IB8=
    =9TnR
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  2. Re: LM_sensors & IBM Thinkpads

    On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:41:14 -0500
    Hakim Singhji wrote:

    >
    > Hi All,
    >
    > Quick question? Are the developers of LM_sensors (gDesklets) still
    > recommending against using LM_sensors with IBM Thinkpads. The
    > documentation that I found on the subject is dated... 2003 was the
    > latest I could find on the subject.


    Until I hear otherwise, I won't be using lm_sensors on my Thinkpad 600e. The Linux on Thinkpads site, http://www.linux-thinkpad.org, lists models known to have problems. I wouldn't use lm_sensors on any Thinkpad though, unless someone else confirms it works on specific models.
+ Reply to Thread
« Print queue question | synchronizing a set of Linux boxes »