Re: Windows XP optimization tricks

In article <VA.00001130.14180b7d@nospam.aaisp.org>, Daniel James wrote:[color=blue]
> As you said: MS used to have a continuous income stream as they brought out
> new versions and charged for the upgrade, but now that Windows changes less
> and less between versions fewer and fewer people are bothering to upgrade.
>[/color]
We finally had a client asking if our in-house software was Vista
compatible. First one (out of around 50 distinct, globally-distributed
clients) to even make a hint of thinking about moving to XP. On previous
experience with them, that means that they'll start the roll-out in
mid-to-late-2008, replacing their existing Win2K environment.
One think you know if you're doing a site visit there and you are
looking at an XP machine : if it's physically connected to the network, the
network is ignoring it and routing it's packets to /dev/null .

--
Aidan Karley
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:11 +0100, but posted later.

In article <MPG.21143020883df94698a33b@news.individual.net>, Conor
wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > they changed enough, that troubleshooting became impossible. I have
> > been using Linux since 1994 and never had this kind of issue.
> >[/color]
> You've been using Linux since 1994? Riight.
>[/color]
That's about when I started with Linuxes. I'd been seriously
considering shelling out for a personal copy of (I think) SCO Unix when
I heard of this thing coming out of Finland.
I think my first install was a very early Slackware.

--
Aidan Karley
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:00 +0100, but posted later.

In article <VA.0000112d.0f58ddcb@nospam.aaisp.org>, Daniel James wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > Firewire was in 2K, SATA is supported by the 2K IDE driver.[/color]
>
> Excellent ... so XP was a completely pointless upgrade too.
>[/color]
Reference my point earlier (ooops, I haven't b-linked yet!)
about the major client who haven't upgraded their enterprise-wide
system from Win2k to XP. (And who have evidently been having problems
for the last year or so in sourcing machines with Win2k for them to
apply their patches to. Also possibly some failures to get Win2K
drivers for ancillary hardware like EXd-certified cameras and recent
printers.)

--
Aidan Karley
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:55 +0100, but posted later.
Using VA 5.51 build 315 under Windows 2000 build 2195.