Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop? - Handheld
This is a discussion on Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop? - Handheld ; Hi All,
I am contemplating purchasing a Viewsonic Viewpad 100 for reading
eBooks and web surfing. The Viewpad 100 only has a StongARM 206 Mhz
processor and I am wondering if it is powerful enough to handle a
remote desktop ...
-
Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop?
Hi All,
I am contemplating purchasing a Viewsonic Viewpad 100 for reading
eBooks and web surfing. The Viewpad 100 only has a StongARM 206 Mhz
processor and I am wondering if it is powerful enough to handle a
remote desktop session to my desktop via a wireless connection.
Basically I know that Pocket Internet Explorer is very limited and
would like to be able to use my desktop browser (Firefox) from the
Viewpad 100 via a remote desktop (or VNC as I know there are VNC
clients for the Pocket PC) connection. I don't expect to watch a movie
over the remote desktop (or VNC) connection rather just web surfing.
Thanks for any input.
- DWek
-
Re: Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop?
On 20 Feb 2005 06:20:16 -0800, dwok wrote:
> I am contemplating purchasing a Viewsonic Viewpad 100 for reading
> eBooks and web surfing. The Viewpad 100 only has a StongARM 206 Mhz
> processor and I am wondering if it is powerful enough to handle a
> remote desktop session to my desktop via a wireless connection.
> Basically I know that Pocket Internet Explorer is very limited and
> would like to be able to use my desktop browser (Firefox) from the
> Viewpad 100 via a remote desktop (or VNC as I know there are VNC
> clients for the Pocket PC) connection. I don't expect to watch a movie
> over the remote desktop (or VNC) connection rather just web surfing.
> Thanks for any input.
I regularly remote control my Zaurus SL-5500 via VNC. The Zaurus has
a Strongarm 206Mhz, but runs linux. I've tried going the other way
and it worked ok, but screen size made that less than useful. The
resolution difference is too big.
Bjørn
--
Bjørn Tore Sund "When in fear, and when in doubt;
bjornts@ii.uib.no Run in circles, scream and shout!"
Interaction! - Anonymous
http://www.interaction.worldcon.org.uk/
-
Re: Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop?
Its fast enough to use TSC and XP Pro Remote Desktop. VNC clients, at least the ones I have tried,
are pretty slow...
If you do use the built-in TSC with Remote Desktop you can also speed things up by not rendering the
PCs desktop wallpaper. See this page, near the end, for help doing that...
http://theillustratednetwork.mvps.or...eshooting.html
--
Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking)
Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual benefit of all of us...
The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights...
"dwok" wrote in message
news:1108909216.425231.63620@f14g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Hi All,
>
> I am contemplating purchasing a Viewsonic Viewpad 100 for reading
> eBooks and web surfing. The Viewpad 100 only has a StongARM 206 Mhz
> processor and I am wondering if it is powerful enough to handle a
> remote desktop session to my desktop via a wireless connection.
> Basically I know that Pocket Internet Explorer is very limited and
> would like to be able to use my desktop browser (Firefox) from the
> Viewpad 100 via a remote desktop (or VNC as I know there are VNC
> clients for the Pocket PC) connection. I don't expect to watch a movie
> over the remote desktop (or VNC) connection rather just web surfing.
> Thanks for any input.
>
> - DWek
>
-
Re: Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop?
"dwok" skrev i melding
news:1108909216.425231.63620@f14g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Hi All,
>
> I am contemplating purchasing a Viewsonic Viewpad 100 for reading
> eBooks and web surfing. The Viewpad 100 only has a StongARM 206 Mhz
> processor and I am wondering if it is powerful enough to handle a
> remote desktop session to my desktop via a wireless connection.
> Basically I know that Pocket Internet Explorer is very limited and
> would like to be able to use my desktop browser (Firefox) from the
> Viewpad 100 via a remote desktop (or VNC as I know there are VNC
> clients for the Pocket PC) connection. I don't expect to watch a movie
> over the remote desktop (or VNC) connection rather just web surfing.
> Thanks for any input.
It will do, but has it vga resolution? its big differens to use a PDA with
vga resolutions when using remote desktop.
/Per W.
-
Re: Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop?
"dwok" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> I am contemplating purchasing a Viewsonic Viewpad 100 for reading
>eBooks and web surfing. The Viewpad 100 only has a StongARM 206 Mhz
>processor and I am wondering if it is powerful enough to handle a
>remote desktop session to my desktop via a wireless connection.
>Basically I know that Pocket Internet Explorer is very limited and
>would like to be able to use my desktop browser (Firefox) from the
>Viewpad 100 via a remote desktop (or VNC as I know there are VNC
>clients for the Pocket PC) connection. I don't expect to watch a movie
>over the remote desktop (or VNC) connection rather just web surfing.
>Thanks for any input.
>
>- DWek
Absolutely. RD requires very little resources on the client. There
were terminal server clients on sub-100MHz handheld and palmsized PCs
years ago.
--
__________________________________________________ ________________________________
Ed Hansberry (Please do *NOT* email me. Post here for the benefit of all)
What is on my Pocket PC? http://www.ehansberry.com/
Microsoft MVP - Mobile Devices www.pocketpc.com
What is an MVP? - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
-
Re: Can 206 Mhz StrongARM handle Remote Desktop?
Excellent! That is good to know. I have had the oppourtunity to hold a
Viewpad 100 in the past and I have to say it was VERY durable. It felt
well put together and solid. Let me ask one other question. There are
two types of "viewpads" one is the Viewpad 100 which as mentioned runs
Win CE 3.0. The other is the Airpanel 100 which runs CE.Net. They both
have the same hardware and memory. Is there any advantage of going with
the "Airpanel" becuase of CE.Net? It does cost more though, by like
$100. Thanks!