Re: known bug in sun's ensemble installer - GEOS
This is a discussion on Re: known bug in sun's ensemble installer - GEOS ; Pat wrote:
> The main GEOS GUI is close to motif
Correction! It is more than close to motif, it is the "real thing", a GEOS
version of the Motif UI, with the registered trademark from the Motif group.
I ...
-
Re: known bug in sun's ensemble installer
Pat wrote:
> The main GEOS GUI is close to motif
Correction! It is more than close to motif, it is the "real thing", a GEOS
version of the Motif UI, with the registered trademark from the Motif group.
I don't know what relations Geoworks had to the Motif group, if they paid
royalties or if it was a member of it. It is definitly not a look-a-like
as you state. It is simple to check, for those who still owns a GEOS version.
Just go into the system directory and scroll down to the motif icon.
>and the other one is supposed to be a clone of Windows, sort of. The current
Windows GUI is fine.
Yep, and the Windows GUI is basically a clone of the Zoomer interface, in
which Microsoft did not do much to conceal in the very first alfa of "Chicago",
even the start button was called Express. For some legal? reason Microsoft
changed that to "Start". Then Newdeal/Myturn/Breadbox made a clone of the
Windows GUI. To be 100% correct, Edward di Geronimo and Gene Anderson did
the latest rewrite of it, which is now a part of Breadbox Ensemble.
> Anyone who has a
> problem with it is just jealous of how good it is or clueless.
No need to feel jealous.Many good things come out of GEOS, even the Windows
GUI.
BR,
Hans
>
> "hyubso" wrote in message
> news:3F3D7231.2070900@prodigy.net...
> > can't goes make use of the NTFS???
> >
> >
> > keep NTFS and replace the the windows graphical environment with GEOS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pat wrote:
> > >>windows directory structure vs. geos directory structure
> > >
> > >
> > > Hyusbo,
> > >
> > > I would take NTFS robustness any day over FAT(Fill in the blank),
which
> is
> > > vulnerable and of an old design. All GEOS does is stick with a 20
year
> old
> > > design. It never changed, and it never will change. I'm guess there
are
> 83
> > > people in the world who still use frequently.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
-
Re: known bug in sun's ensemble installer
"Hans Lindgren" wrote in message
news:NewsReader.1.0.20038166106022976@news1.telia. com...
> Pat wrote:
>
> > The main GEOS GUI is close to motif
>
> Correction! It is more than close to motif, it is the "real thing", a GEOS
> version of the Motif UI, with the registered trademark from the Motif
group.
> I don't know what relations Geoworks had to the Motif group, if they paid
> royalties or if it was a member of it. It is definitly not a look-a-like
> as you state. It is simple to check, for those who still owns a GEOS
version.
> Just go into the system directory and scroll down to the motif icon.
I talked with Brian Dougherty after he had demoed the Motif UI and Open Look
UI, as well as the IBM CUA-3 UI. At the time, Brian was hoping to cut a deal
with IBM for a GEOS version on the IBM PC Jr. Due to the limited resources
that GEOS had, at the time, I believe they went with a subset of Motif,
which was intended for Unix workstations.
> Yep, and the Windows GUI is basically a clone of the Zoomer interface, in
> which Microsoft did not do much to conceal in the very first alfa of
"Chicago",
> even the start button was called Express. For some legal? reason Microsoft
> changed that to "Start". Then Newdeal/Myturn/Breadbox made a clone of the
> Windows GUI. To be 100% correct, Edward di Geronimo and Gene Anderson did
> the latest rewrite of it, which is now a part of Breadbox Ensemble.
Dream on.
> >
> > "hyubso" wrote in message
> > news:3F3D7231.2070900@prodigy.net...
> > > can't goes make use of the NTFS???
> > >
> > >
> > > keep NTFS and replace the the windows graphical environment with GEOS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pat wrote:
> > > >>windows directory structure vs. geos directory structure
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hyusbo,
> > > >
> > > > I would take NTFS robustness any day over FAT(Fill in the blank),
> which
> > is
> > > > vulnerable and of an old design. All GEOS does is stick with a 20
> year
> > old
> > > > design. It never changed, and it never will change. I'm guess there
> are
> > 83
> > > > people in the world who still use frequently.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
-
Re: known bug in sun's ensemble installer
Pat wrote:
> "Hans Lindgren" wrote in message
> news:NewsReader.1.0.20038166106022976@news1.telia. com...
> > Pat wrote:
> >
> > > The main GEOS GUI is close to motif
> >
> > Correction! It is more than close to motif, it is the "real thing",
a GEOS
> > version of the Motif UI, with the registered trademark from the Motif
> group.
> > I don't know what relations Geoworks had to the Motif group, if they
paid
> > royalties or if it was a member of it. It is definitly not a look-a-like
> > as you state. It is simple to check, for those who still owns a GEOS
> version.
> > Just go into the system directory and scroll down to the motif icon.
>
> I talked with Brian Dougherty after he had demoed the Motif UI and Open
Look
> UI, as well as the IBM CUA-3 UI. At the time, Brian was hoping to cut
a deal
> with IBM for a GEOS version on the IBM PC Jr. Due to the limited resources
> that GEOS had, at the time, I believe they went with a subset of Motif,
> which was intended for Unix workstations.
>
> > Yep, and the Windows GUI is basically a clone of the Zoomer interface,
in
> > which Microsoft did not do much to conceal in the very first alfa of
> "Chicago",
> > even the start button was called Express. For some legal? reason Microsoft
> > changed that to "Start". Then Newdeal/Myturn/Breadbox made a clone of
the
> > Windows GUI. To be 100% correct, Edward di Geronimo and Gene Anderson
did
> > the latest rewrite of it, which is now a part of Breadbox Ensemble.
>
> Dream on.
>
> > >
> > > "hyubso" wrote in message
> > > news:3F3D7231.2070900@prodigy.net...
> > > > can't goes make use of the NTFS???
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > keep NTFS and replace the the windows graphical environment with
GEOS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pat wrote:
> > > > >>windows directory structure vs. geos directory structure
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hyusbo,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would take NTFS robustness any day over FAT(Fill in the blank),
> > which
> > > is
> > > > > vulnerable and of an old design. All GEOS does is stick with a
20
> > year
> > > old
> > > > > design. It never changed, and it never will change. I'm guess
there
> > are
> > > 83
> > > > > people in the world who still use frequently.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>