This is a discussion on Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: [FreeBSD] Fix for ServerWorksHT1000 in upcoming 7.1?] - FreeBSD ; On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Fernan Aguero wrote: > > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:05:22 -0300 > From: Fernan Aguero > To: Kirk Strauser > Cc: email@example.com , firstname.lastname@example.org , > John Baldwin , email@example.com > ...
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Fernan Aguero
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:05:22 -0300
> From: Fernan Aguero
> To: Kirk Strauser
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
> John Baldwin
> Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] Fix for ServerWorks HT1000 in upcoming 7.1?
>> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 17:10:49 Xin LI wrote:
>> > Did anyone who can trigger the data corruption has tried John's patch
>> > and let us know if it worked?
>> > Cheers,
>> I can confirm that it works on my PowerEdge SC1435. With both controllers
>> running in SATA150 mode, I have an uptime of 101 days with moderately heavy
>> Kirk Strauser
> Same here. The ata_ht1000.patch referenced in this thread
> works, in my case at least with 1 controller running in
> SATA150 mode (I have only 1 disk).
> However, the recent 7.1-BETA2 does not work for me, contrary
> to reports saying that this BETA contains the patch. Looking
> at the sources, it seems evident that the patch applied is
> not identical to the ata_ht1000.patch in this thread.
> This patch:
> is the only requirement to turn a broken 7.1-BETA1 into a
> working 7.1 for a Dell PowerEdge SC1435.
> The recent 7.1-BETA2, does not work!
can anyone confirm if 7.1-BETA2 works for this platform?
It does not for me.
Will there be another BETA/RC before 7.1 is rolled out?
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"