Re: [Qemu-devel] first tests of qemu svn r5646 on FreeBSD - usbstill slow, bsd-user doesn't build, some warnings...

On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 05:37:37PM +0100, I wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <f43fc5580811072243k2c92b4fxe368a8ed638d80a0@mail.gmail.com> you write:[color=green]
> >On 11/7/08, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I just prepared another experimental emulators/qemu-devel port update,
> >> [url]http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20081107.patch[/url]
> >> I haven't tested it that much yet (you are welcome to help there! :)
> >> but so far didn't notice much changes compared to last time (r5499),
> >> usb is still slow with my Linux 2.6.26 guest (probably to be expected,
> >> nothing committed there since.)[/color]
> >
> >The patch is against a bunch of patches, which makes it hard to see
> >what has really changed. Could you make an updated set of patches
> >available somewhere? At least osdep.c and qemu-char.c patches look
> >reasonable enough to be committed.
> >[/color]
> I'll add a shar of the 20081107 qemu-devel port's files/*patch* below,
> (yes most of these probably shouldn't be merged... The ones named *-patch
> are conditionally applied depending on user-set OPTIONS.)
>
> Oh and btw the osdep.c patch was already posted here, see
> [url]http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-10/msg00038.html[/url]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> In other news: The new sparc64-bsd-user target doesn't build because
> >> SYSCALL_G7RFLAG and SYSCALL_G2RFLAG are undefined, and I noticed a few
> >> warnings that may be interesting:[/color]
> >
> >The attached patch should fix the undefined flag problem, please test.[/color]
>
> Nope, still two of them left at line 219ff. :)
>
> Here comes the shar:
>
> # This is a shell archive. Save it in a file, remove anything before
> # this line, and then unpack it by entering "sh file". Note, it may
> # create directories; files and directories will be owned by you and
> # have default permissions.
> #
> # This archive contains:
> #
> # files/
> # files/cdrom-dma-patch
> # files/patch-90_security
> # files/patch-CVE-2008-0928
> # files/patch-CVE-2008-4539
> # files/patch-Makefile
> # files/patch-aa
> # files/patch-ac
> # files/patch-audio-4
> # files/patch-audio-sdlaudio.c
> # files/patch-bc
> # files/patch-bd
> # files/patch-be
> # files/patch-bf
> # files/patch-bg
> # files/patch-block.c
> # files/patch-bsdusb.patch
> # files/patch-bt
> # files/patch-configure
> # files/patch-cpu-exec.c
> # files/patch-emulate-aio
> # files/patch-exec-all.h
> # files/patch-exec.c
> # files/patch-fbsd
> # files/patch-fix_bsd_user_fbsd[/color]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ooops, ignore this one, leftover from testing...

(And btw you can ignore the 0 byte ones too, they were just for generating
diffs easier.)

Sorry,
Juergen
_______________________________________________
[email]freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org[/email] mailing list
[url]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation[/url]
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"