This is a discussion on Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable - FreeBSD ; > From: Tijl Coosemans > Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200 > > On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable > > on ...
> From: Tijl Coosemans
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200
> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
> > on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though:
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: www/linux-flashplugin9:
> > Unstable, no sound, generally unusable state
> > I also thought that there might be a solution to the sound issue.
> > Can anyone confirm the status? I would be happy to delete the IGNORE
> > line if I thought it would work and I know what changes might be needed
> > to get it to work. Even without sound, it would probably be useful. Too
> > many sites are using Flash 9 for the entry page and there is no way to
> > get to the site at all with Flash 7.
> Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed last
> weekend, but haven't for some reason.
> The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedback:
> The relevant thread on emulation@ is:
Tijl (and Paul).
I saw the entry for the fix in the 7.1 release notes, so assumed that it
had been MFC'ed. I'll watch svn-src (or whatever cvs-src turned into)
for the commit(s).
I never have read emulation, so I need to go read the discussion.
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----