Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled? - FreeBSD

This is a discussion on Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled? - FreeBSD ; Is it intentional that pmcstat -c '*' does not use the haltedcpus mask while pmcstat will? Ryan Stone _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...reebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled?

  1. Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled?

    Is it intentional that pmcstat -c '*' does not use the
    haltedcpus mask while pmcstat will?

    Ryan Stone
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...reebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  2. Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled?

    > Is it intentional that pmcstat -c '*' does not use the
    > haltedcpus mask while pmcstat will?


    No, its just the way the code evolved. Fixed in SVN #183672.

    Koshy
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...reebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


+ Reply to Thread