FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock! - FreeBSD
This is a discussion on FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock! - FreeBSD ; Hello, freebsd-stable.
Sometimes my FreeBSD 7 machine becomes semi-dead: all network sttack
is working (pingable, etc), all LIVE processes are live, but it is
impossible to create new (and, it seems, EXIT finished) process.
So, I can work in shell ...
-
FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Hello, freebsd-stable.
Sometimes my FreeBSD 7 machine becomes semi-dead: all network sttack
is working (pingable, etc), all LIVE processes are live, but it is
impossible to create new (and, it seems, EXIT finished) process.
So, I can work in shell via SSH, if I have connection, but if I try
to run any external program session is lost for me -- it try to run it
forever, and ^C is not working. Same with "real" console. Same with
scripts -- if script working, it locks on next external command
forever and can not be killed with ^C.
It is dual-core (E4500)-based comuter, amd64 arch. It have these
debug options in kernel:
options DDB
options KDB
options KDB_UNATTENDED
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options WITNESS
options DEBUG_MEMGUARD
options WITNESS_KDB
options MUTEX_DEBUG
I have kernel debugger and here is some information (it is re-typed
from screen, so is not byte-to-byte exact output and I skipped long
64-bit addresses):
(1) show allpcpu
Current CPU: 1
cpuid = 0
curthread = pid 12: "idle: cpu0"
curpcb =
fpcurthread = none
idlethread = pid 12: "idle: cpu0"
spinlocks held:
cpuid = 1
curthread = pid 17: "swi6: Giant taskq"
curpcb =
fpcurthread = none
idlethread = pid 11: "idle: cpu1"
spinlocks held:
(2) show locks
exclusive sleep mutex Giant r = 0 (ADDRESS) locked @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1035
(3) show alllocks
process 723 (sshd) thread (TID)
exclusive sx so_rcv_sx r = 1 (ADDRESS) locked @
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_sockbuf.c:148
process 574 (nmdb) thread (TID)
exclusive sx user map r = 0 (ADDRESS) locked @
/usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:3111
process 17 (swi6: Ginat taskq) thread (TID)
exclusive sleep mutex Giant r = 0 (ADDRESS) locked @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1035
(4) alltrace shows:
(a) I have MANY (about 20) sendmail processes (on
computer without mail traffic at all!), and all of them have
"VOP_LOCK1_AVP()" in trace, which leads to sched_switch() after some
steps, including _sleep().
(b) cron is sleeping with sched_switch() after vfork() (Oh!
Impossibility to create processes!)
(c) All other userland processes are traced up to sched_switch() from
different syscalls, via _sleep()...
I don't reboot this computer for now, and waiting for requests which
can help diagnose this situation 
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> Sometimes my FreeBSD 7 machine becomes semi-dead: all network sttack
>> is working (pingable, etc), all LIVE processes are live, but it is
>> impossible to create new (and, it seems, EXIT finished) process.
> It is SCHED_ULE
It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I have computer in state,
when 4 iozone processes are hanged in "Disk wait" state, and I can not
"cd" to filesystem, which is tested by "iozone".
But I can create processes, work on system, etc., if I don't touch
this filesystem.
--
// Lev Serebryakov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I have computer in state,
> when 4 iozone processes are hanged in "Disk wait" state, and I can not
> "cd" to filesystem, which is tested by "iozone".
> But I can create processes, work on system, etc., if I don't touch this
> filesystem.
I can reproduce it, creating gmirror on 5 disks (yes, not very useful
configuration, but I've started from non-base-system RAID5 and need to
exclude it), FS with 64Kb blocks, and 4 threads of iozone with mixed
workload (-i 8 -+p 70).
All 5 disks are ICH9DO-based, SATA-II WD5000AAKS HDDs.
--
// Lev Serebryakov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
On Monday 16 June 2008 07:21:15 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I have computer in state,
> > when 4 iozone processes are hanged in "Disk wait" state, and I can not
> > "cd" to filesystem, which is tested by "iozone".
> > But I can create processes, work on system, etc., if I don't touch this
> > filesystem.
>
> I can reproduce it, creating gmirror on 5 disks (yes, not very useful
> configuration, but I've started from non-base-system RAID5 and need to
> exclude it), FS with 64Kb blocks, and 4 threads of iozone with mixed
> workload (-i 8 -+p 70).
>
> All 5 disks are ICH9DO-based, SATA-II WD5000AAKS HDDs.
Try getting the 'ps' output from ddb. Also, get a crash dump if you can.
--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re[2]: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Hello, John.
You wrote 23 2008 ., 18:47:33:
> On Monday 16 June 2008 07:21:15 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> > It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I have computer in state,
>> > when 4 iozone processes are hanged in "Disk wait" state, and I can not
>> > "cd" to filesystem, which is tested by "iozone".
>> > But I can create processes, work on system, etc., if I don't touch this
>> > filesystem.
>>
>> I can reproduce it, creating gmirror on 5 disks (yes, not very useful
>> configuration, but I've started from non-base-system RAID5 and need to
>> exclude it), FS with 64Kb blocks, and 4 threads of iozone with mixed
>> workload (-i 8 -+p 70).
>>
>> All 5 disks are ICH9DO-based, SATA-II WD5000AAKS HDDs.
> Try getting the 'ps' output from ddb. Also, get a crash dump if you can.
It was tracked douwn to known deadlock in buffer allocator when
buffer map is fragmented (thnx to kib@!). Workaround is known: don't
use FSes with 16Kb and 64Kb blocks on same system in one time. 16/32
mixture works well 
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, John.
> You wrote 23 2008 ., 18:47:33:
>
>> On Monday 16 June 2008 07:21:15 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>>> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>>>> It seems to be ATA/SATA or UFS2 problem: now I have computer in state,
>>>> when 4 iozone processes are hanged in "Disk wait" state, and I can not
>>>> "cd" to filesystem, which is tested by "iozone".
>>>> But I can create processes, work on system, etc., if I don't touch this
>>>> filesystem.
>>> I can reproduce it, creating gmirror on 5 disks (yes, not very useful
>>> configuration, but I've started from non-base-system RAID5 and need to
>>> exclude it), FS with 64Kb blocks, and 4 threads of iozone with mixed
>>> workload (-i 8 -+p 70).
>>>
>>> All 5 disks are ICH9DO-based, SATA-II WD5000AAKS HDDs.
>> Try getting the 'ps' output from ddb. Also, get a crash dump if you can.
> It was tracked douwn to known deadlock in buffer allocator when
> buffer map is fragmented (thnx to kib@!). Workaround is known: don't
> use FSes with 16Kb and 64Kb blocks on same system in one time. 16/32
> mixture works well 
>
>
Is there a PR filed with this bug? Having the specific information
recorded will be very useful.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re[2]: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Hello, Kris.
You wrote 23 2008 ., 19:56:14:
> Is there a PR filed with this bug? Having the specific information
> recorded will be very useful.
Kostik (kib@) says, that I don't need to fill PR for this issue...
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-
Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE deadlock!
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Kris.
> You wrote 23 июня 2008 г., 19:56:14:
>
>> Is there a PR filed with this bug? Having the specific information
>> recorded will be very useful.
> Kostik (kib@) says, that I don't need to fill PR for this issue...
>
OK, that is good enough for me 
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"