This is a discussion on Re: Multiple routing table support commited - FreeBSD ; Julian, Thanks so much for this. Julian Elischer wrote: > I have committed the base of teh Multi-routing-table support. > I am current;y waiting for it to loop back to me before a final > make universe test, but I ...
Julian,
Thanks so much for this.
Julian Elischer wrote:
> I have committed the base of teh Multi-routing-table support.
> I am current;y waiting for it to loop back to me before a final
> make universe test, but I think it should be ok.
> if you do nothing you should not see any difference.
I think you well deserve a break after all that effort. I look forward
to p4 merge >;->
[I waded into the pf code last week, to write a patch to allow IP Router
Alert out by default -- as it breaks IGMP/MLD and thus link-scope/all
multicasting.
It looks like it wouldn't be too difficult for someone to add a "setfib"
tag, however, this can break backwards compatibility with pfsync'ed
nodes if pfstate/pfrule are changed.]
> This code, backported to 6.3 is running on Ironport appliances
> and Cisco/Ironport has graciously allowed it to be given back.
Thanks also to them for making this possible.
cheers
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis...reebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"